A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted
The Pet food company concludes that the recalled pet food is not responsible for the symptom like vomiting, lethargy and other sign of illness experienced by the pets of different owners y giving the reason that the recalled pet food samples were tested and the testing result showed that all the chemicals in the food were right and are approved for the use in pet food. By meticulously observing the reason given by the company i do not find this reason adequate and sufficient.
Firstly, as the author states that the sample were tested and the results were positive, there is no mention of how many samples were tested. if out of 4 million or more samples only 1000 or 10000 samples would have been tested than the result might be purely false. company should test each and every sample recalled and moreover, show the result to the public via newspaper or its official magazine or catalogue.
Secondly, the company should also state that the complains are not only registered for their brand but for other brands too to strengthen its conclusion. If this particular brand is being criticized for its substances in pet food which are leading to these symptoms then there are very high chances that the company is responsible for their costumers health.
finally, the company stated that after the recalled samples were tested, all the chemicals present in the food are approved for the use of pet food, but there is nothing said about the concentration of the chemicals used in the pet food. If the concentration differs that can also lead to many dangerous symptoms. The company is mum about the concentration of the chemicals used so that might be the possibility the company is hiding from the user of this particular brand.
In the end, I think this pet food company has not given the adequate and strong reasons for its conclusion that their food is fit for the pets. company should test all the sample not only for used chemicals but also for the concentration used in them. For giving the strong reasons, the company should rule out all the possibilities mentioned above in the essay and should own up for its mistakes and try to improve further.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 49 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Opak Pulu | 65 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | farhadmoqimi | 29 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | Prudhvi6054 | 63 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | solankis304 | 29 | view |
- Essay topics: Summarise the points made in the lecture,being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or gro 80
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 16
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child. Of all the dance schools in Elmtown, Pirouettes has the most intensive program, and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world. Many of our students have 50
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals. 50
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 431, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...serving the reason given by the company i do not find this reason adequate and su...
^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ention of how many samples were tested. if out of 4 million or more samples only 1...
^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Company
... than the result might be purely false. company should test each and every sample recal...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...ponsible for their costumers health. finally, the company stated that after the reca...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of the chemicals used in the pet food. If the concentration differs that can also...
^^
Line 9, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Company
...on that their food is fit for the pets. company should test all the sample not only for...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'i think']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.236180904523 0.25644967241 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.173366834171 0.15541462614 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0628140703518 0.0836205057962 75% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0577889447236 0.0520304965353 111% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0251256281407 0.0272364105082 92% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138190954774 0.125424944231 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0628140703518 0.0416121511921 151% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.50089264064 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0125628140704 0.026700313972 47% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00251256281407 0.001811407834 139% => OK
Determiners: 0.133165829146 0.113004496875 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0226130653266 0.0255425247493 89% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00753768844221 0.0127820249294 59% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2168.0 2731.13054187 79% => OK
No of words: 375.0 446.07635468 84% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78133333333 6.12365571057 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.57801047555 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.317333333333 0.378187486979 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.232 0.287650121315 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.146666666667 0.208842608468 70% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101333333333 0.135150697306 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50089264064 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 207.018472906 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44 0.469332199767 94% => OK
Word variations: 45.6878172158 52.1807786196 88% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.039408867 65% => OK
Sentence length: 28.8461538462 23.2022227129 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8864983085 57.7814097925 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.769230769 141.986410481 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8461538462 23.2022227129 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 0.724660767414 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.58251231527 167% => OK
Readability: 52.0461538462 51.9672348444 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.70588235294 1.8405768891 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.592143310257 0.441005458295 134% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.175364902376 0.135418324435 129% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0653413952176 0.0829849096947 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.71234875304 0.58762219726 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.149001762292 0.147661913831 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.273943854074 0.193483328276 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.171915364552 0.0970749176394 177% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.374705787305 0.42659136922 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.141773137666 0.0774707102158 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.407555958707 0.312017818177 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154219530202 0.0698173142475 221% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.87684729064 29% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 6.46551724138 124% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 14.657635468 89% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.