Some people fear that technology is gradually taking over control of our lives, while others think is has lead to many positive developments in all aspects of their lives. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
An issue attracting the attention of numerous people is the impacts of technology on our lives. Many are scared that human beings' role is eventually occupied due to the technological influence, meanwhile others believe that people are able to take advantage thanks to its potential improvements. In my opinion, technology catalyzes the pessimistic future for mankind.
There is a strong argument in its favor of enhancing technology to develop. It is undeniable that thanks to technological developments, man now lives a more modern and comfortable life than previous generations. In particular, many high-tech products, especially smart phones with numerous functions such as taking photos, accessing the Internet and playing games, are being used too widely. Moreover, robots and labor-saving devices play essential roles in helping the household chores and manufacture with a view to taking pressure on workers. Accordingly, people can benefit the technological advance in order to gain wonderful lives. Nonetheless, notwithstanding the advantages of technology, there are several drawbacks worth taking into account. Firstly, citizens become less active in this modern world and this is unprecedented. In fact, a profusion of white collar workers does not need go to their offices on account of facsimile. Additionally, numerous managers spend time sitting and typing has resulted in the reduction of health as well as endurance. Consequently, modern citizens would become weaker to encounter with challenges in the future.
Another important argument is that technology wastes too much time. To be more specific, social networks and websites have led to the uncountable number of addicts. For instance, numerous teenagers love chatting and surfing news on Facebook without controlling their time. Therefore, this would result in not only the wasteful time consumption but also eye strain under the circumstance of exceeding use.
All things considered, both sides of the argument prove to be plausible to some extent, but my belief is that technology processes profound effects on our lives. One possible offer is that education should raise awareness and instill insights into the methods to utilize technological developments properly.
- Many people in the undeveloped world die from diseases that are curable because they cant not afford the medication to treat themselves. Do you believe that drug companies in the developed world should be obliged to make their product avaiable at reduced 67
- Individuals can do nothing to change society. Any new developments can only be brought about by governments and large institutions. How far do you agree or disagree? 50
- Some people say that university student should pay the full cost of their education. Other say that university education should be free. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Add relevant example from your own knowledge and experience. 73
- Some people think cities are not good places for children to grow up in and they would have a better childhood in the countryside. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think cities are not good places for children to grow up in and they would have a better childhood in the countryside. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...n our lives. Many are scared that human beings role is eventually occupied due to the ...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for instance', 'in fact', 'in particular', 'such as', 'as well as', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.262599469496 0.247107183377 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.153846153846 0.155533422707 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.122015915119 0.0946595960268 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0636604774536 0.0501214627716 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0238726790451 0.0437548338989 55% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114058355438 0.122226691241 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0503978779841 0.0403226058552 125% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.08509951399 2.80594681477 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0371352785146 0.0326793684256 114% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0716180371353 0.0861772015684 83% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0106100795756 0.021408717616 50% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.011925033212 0% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2250.0 1933.35771543 116% => OK
No of words: 338.0 316.048096192 107% => OK
Chars per words: 6.65680473373 6.12580529183 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20517956788 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.470414201183 0.374742101984 126% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.35798816568 0.28420135186 126% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.289940828402 0.203846283523 142% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.201183431953 0.137316102897 147% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08509951399 2.80594681477 110% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.037074148 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644970414201 0.56093040696 115% => OK
Word variations: 80.1942686122 60.7387585426 132% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0891783567 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.7894736842 20.7743622355 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4287335983 49.517814964 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.421052632 127.492653851 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 20.7743622355 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.05263157895 0.814263465372 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 53.5882902523 49.1944974215 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.76923076923 1.69124875643 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332185333158 0.332605444948 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0410262123833 0.102741220458 40% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0323345072924 0.0668466124924 48% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.440870854454 0.534860350844 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.121775822921 0.148594505496 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115210472909 0.134430193775 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578552014406 0.0742795772207 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.301502771505 0.324371583561 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0510840025741 0.0638462369009 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227503964366 0.228012699653 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520685554592 0.058150111329 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.