TPO 23:
It is evident that today's lifestyle has undergone different changes due to advent of the internet and other fast transmitted equipment. The discussion has centered on whether to work fast which is accompanied with different risk factors or to slow down the pace of working for a higher secure. While I do not to refute to the latter view in a broad perspective, I believe that mild trend of performance in every business can benefit all the human beings based on the following reasons.
The first point to support this is that casual work is not always associated with boons. In fact, it should be noted that being carefree about some sensitive occupations can bring about hazardous aftermaths. Consider a situation in medical care center, there is a little room for doubt that any minor mistakes applied by a careless cardinal practitioner for cutting short the amount of surgery time might end up with serious injuries for patients. Hence, accepting this kind of risk is neither logical nor beneficial for all walks of life.
Moreover, it is clearly perceived that the quality should not be sacrifice the quantities. In fact, producing low quality consumptions, with a high profit margin, in the minimal amount of time, at first glance might be alluring to all business managers. However, it is not the case in the long-run. In order to gain reputation and run as a lucrative business, most managers have a sharp perception about this fact that the productivity has played a significant role in different aspects of their careers. Therefore, they are of the opinion to slow down their amount of outcomes in order to survive in the current competitive environment which the quality is the people's first priority.
On the other side, there have been some occasions that speed in performing task seems necessary. As an example, in exchange market, a broker with an ability to assess different aspects of risk factors in stock investment instantaneously can benefit not only himself but also its shareholders to gain a higher level of profit. However, the experience acquired from working in long time should not be overlooked. In fact, there is a direct relation between doing an act repeatedly and the amount time it consumes. As a result, being expert in even sophisticated field might be important to carry out works quickly.
From what have been discussed, causality in work is not the only solution for competing the fast pace of changes. As it was mentioned, the baleful consequence of being careless and the importance of productivity are the main justifications to act cautiously. Nonetheless, practicing continuously might be a logical suggestion to keep pace with harsh environment.
- TPO-19 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 58
- TPO-22 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
TPO 23: It is evident that todays lifestyle has undergone different chang...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'even so', 'in fact', 'kind of', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.226530612245 0.229887763892 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.163265306122 0.158761421928 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.102040816327 0.0866891130778 118% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0530612244898 0.046263068375 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0265306122449 0.0685040099705 39% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138775510204 0.118717715034 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0571428571429 0.0351676179071 162% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.89467535454 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.030612244898 0.0309702414327 99% => OK
Particles: 0.00816326530612 0.00188951952338 432% => OK
Determiners: 0.108163265306 0.0887237588012 122% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0204081632653 0.0209618222197 97% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00816326530612 0.0139019557991 59% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2712.0 2387.08602151 114% => OK
No of words: 448.0 408.028673835 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05357142857 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.352678571429 0.338922669872 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.294642857143 0.251872472559 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.205357142857 0.174417080927 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149553571429 0.112833075102 133% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89467535454 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.524397521467 104% => OK
Word variations: 64.7547952691 59.2087087015 109% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.4 20.5533526081 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7024902688 48.84282405 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.6 120.699889404 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.5533526081 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.644075263715 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 51.8642857143 45.7405998639 113% => OK
Elegance: 1.73949579832 1.45489161554 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306645612661 0.300154397459 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0744353818087 0.103427244359 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0523543605707 0.0752933317313 70% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.526060534843 0.497263757937 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.120875286758 0.151897553556 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119402942935 0.114077575197 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514800141261 0.0781384742642 66% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.335456265243 0.336927656856 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0591409053695 0.067059652881 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204737065781 0.210909579961 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356927317171 0.0618886996521 58% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.42114695341 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.6433691756 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.