“Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight."
The letter of the editor of a national aeronautics magazine states that manned space flights are very costly and dangerous and the series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that they have gathered useful information without the cost and risks associated with sending the men and women into space. While in the first glance it seems convincing but there are many significant underlying flaws that raise doubt about the authors conclusion.
Firstly, the author did not mention about the cost of the unmanned space probes. The argument relies upon what amount of the cost is associated with an manned space flights and unmanned. If the author would have mentioned about the cost then the argument may be bolstered by comparing the cost of both.
Secondly, they did not mention about the danger that is associated with the manned space flights by giving some examples. The author did not mention the cost of the unmanned space flights if the author would have mentioned about the cost in which we have high rates for the unmanned space flights then the argument would be fallacious. Hence, the assumption cannot be justified by some information given by the author. The author fails to consider the difference between the manned and unmanned space flights that might replicate the fallacy result.
Moreover, the author told that recent studies about the unmanned space flights but he did not state recent studies about the manned space ships. They mentioned that useful information was gathered by the robots which was invented by the men. But,more than the robot the person can collect more information because robot is created by the man and man is more intelligent than the robot because he is the inventor of the machine.
It also tells that costs and risks of sending men and women into the space can be reduced but he did not provide sufficient information regarding the manned space ships and unmanned too. The argument unfairly assumes that unmanned space ships are superior than the manned space ships but there is no sufficient evidence to bolster the argument. The author also thinks that they should invest in unmanned space ship rather than in manned space crafts but to invest in unmanned we should have sufficient gathering about the information.
To sum up,I elucidate that by providing some more information or the evidence this argument would be more convincing.
- “The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every ef 50
- “Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending m 50
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...rlying flaws that raise doubt about the authors conclusion. Firstly, the author did...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se doubt about the authors conclusion. Firstly, the author did not mention abou...
^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...t amount of the cost is associated with an manned space flights and unmanned. If t...
^^
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...h an manned space flights and unmanned. If the author would have mentioned about t...
^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had mentioned'?
Suggestion: had mentioned
...ace flights and unmanned. If the author would have mentioned about the cost then the argument may be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had mentioned'?
Suggestion: had mentioned
...he unmanned space flights if the author would have mentioned about the cost in which we have high ra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , more
...obots which was invented by the men. But,more than the robot the person can collect m...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 257, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
... that unmanned space ships are superior than the manned space ships but there is no ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
...ring about the information. To sum up,I elucidate that by providing some more i...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243498817967 0.25644967241 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.174940898345 0.15541462614 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0874704491726 0.0836205057962 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0449172576832 0.0520304965353 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0283687943262 0.0272364105082 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130023640662 0.125424944231 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0567375886525 0.0416121511921 136% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.44328098655 2.79052419416 88% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00945626477541 0.026700313972 35% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00236406619385 0.001811407834 131% => OK
Determiners: 0.137115839243 0.113004496875 121% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0260047281324 0.0255425247493 102% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.016548463357 0.0127820249294 129% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2409.0 2731.13054187 88% => OK
No of words: 398.0 446.07635468 89% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0527638191 6.12365571057 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.57801047555 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.359296482412 0.378187486979 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.251256281407 0.287650121315 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.178391959799 0.208842608468 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105527638191 0.135150697306 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44328098655 2.79052419416 88% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 207.018472906 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.407035175879 0.469332199767 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 42.7937193974 52.1807786196 82% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.039408867 80% => OK
Sentence length: 24.875 23.2022227129 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3147440619 57.7814097925 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.5625 141.986410481 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 23.2022227129 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9375 0.724660767414 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 3.58251231527 251% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 50.0006281407 51.9672348444 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.73333333333 1.8405768891 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.494368588255 0.441005458295 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.153612356765 0.135418324435 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0670188291473 0.0829849096947 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.720252118553 0.58762219726 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130240642156 0.147661913831 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.235475654931 0.193483328276 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145263396083 0.0970749176394 150% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.504358725114 0.42659136922 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.206332574265 0.0774707102158 266% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.329337152967 0.312017818177 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143867608547 0.0698173142475 206% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.33743842365 36% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.87684729064 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 5.36822660099 168% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 14.657635468 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.