Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Is the human species so superior to all the other living beings that it has the right to grab the homes of the other species? Or is it a responsibility solely given to us by the nature to look after all of them? Although human civilization requires widespread development, it is our civic duty to protect the wildlife and preserve it in the way nature has given us.
Earth is inhabited by not only the race of mankind but by about millions of wild animals and plants which reside in the abundant jungles and deep under the sea. These are the only places where some specific animals can survive. Even if our civilization demands to spread our cities to control the population, we should not cut down the wild jungles and destroy the homes of the helpless wild species to build our own shelter. Unfortunately, interfering with the wilderness has created a disturbance among the residents of these places and hence, animals like wild elephants and deer are entering our urbanized areas. Ultimately, this is doing much more harm to our society than it is benefiting us due to increased economic gain from these areas.
Along with all these, interfering with the wilderness has also brought an imbalance in the environment. The wild life especially the plants and trees are responsible for many natural phenomenon which keeps the earth in a stable condition. As a consequence of the decreasing number of the green areas, we are facing problems like global warming, intense air pressure variation, severe storms and others. Hence, the only way to check these problems will be to preserve the wild life which is the only hope to bring back the equilibrium.
On the contrary, giving a popular support to the wild life may bring upon a huge expense on the nations. By eliminating the wild jungles, people not only get space for urban and economic development but also get invaluable materials which boosts the economic growth of the countries. Henceforth, people usually feel it to be an unwise idea to preserve the wilderness at the cost of the economic profit.
As we have seen, our intrusion in the wildlife benefits us in many ways. But being the most evolved species of the earth it is also our prime responsibility to take care of the Mother Nature as well as her gifts, no matter how wild it is to us. Hence on conclusion, I believe the nations should pass laws to preserve the wild animals and plants not only for the harmony of the wildlife but also for nurture of the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. 16
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 75
- "To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories. Buckingham's enrollment is growing and, based on current trends, will double over the next 50 years, thus making existing dormitory space inadequate. 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 246, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... gifts, no matter how wild it is to us. Hence on conclusion, I believe the nations sh...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'well', 'after all', 'as well as', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.228632478632 0.240241500013 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.134615384615 0.157235817809 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.106837606838 0.0880659088768 121% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0491452991453 0.0497285424764 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0576923076923 0.0444667217837 130% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.106837606838 0.12292977631 87% => OK
Participles: 0.034188034188 0.0406280797675 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.66372601847 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0405982905983 0.030933414821 131% => OK
Particles: 0.00641025641026 0.0016655270985 385% => OK
Determiners: 0.136752136752 0.0997080785238 137% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0106837606838 0.0249443105267 43% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0128205128205 0.0148568991511 86% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2489.0 2732.02544248 91% => OK
No of words: 434.0 452.878318584 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73502304147 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.315668202765 0.366273622748 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.230414746544 0.280924506359 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.161290322581 0.200843997647 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0944700460829 0.132149295362 71% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66372601847 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 219.290929204 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497695852535 0.48968727796 102% => OK
Word variations: 55.8385562913 55.4138127331 101% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.1111111111 23.380412469 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1940408673 59.4972553346 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.277777778 141.124799967 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 23.380412469 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.611111111111 0.674092028746 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 47.1525857655 51.4728631049 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.53097345133 1.64882698954 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132315412351 0.391690518653 34% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120349210787 0.123202303941 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0700610099199 0.077325440228 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.615177592322 0.547984918172 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.126925599209 0.149214159877 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660877552395 0.161403998019 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037332795992 0.0892212321368 42% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.507971225247 0.385218514788 132% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0268830546228 0.0692045440612 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956560528881 0.275328986314 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225295859493 0.0653680567796 34% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.