The reading and the lecture focus on different opinions about the team group and their necessities in the work. In the reading , the writer presents the merits of the team group in the work. According to the lecture, however, the lecturer states that these advantages appear to be sketchy. Nevertheless, the writer points out that the group team has knowledge, skills, and experience than any single individual. Everyone shares in taking the decisions since when they take decisions, they usually discuss the project together. thus, they are coming up with the correct decision, and creative solutions. In addition, they can work quickly when the company assigned some tasks to them to do it. they are sharing the ideas together and end up finishing the tasks with a good quality. the team member who voices in making the decision fell better about making the work that is required than they might be doing work that is forced n them by other. Finally,group team can be very rewarding, they have the chance to get the promotion by making a great accomplishment in the work.
On the other hand, the speaker presents a different side of the arguments. According to the lecture, the speaker states that the team group is not helpful to profit the company and there are some issues to support the idea. First of all, not all the members of the team contribute in making decisions. If the company assigned two influentials to see what they are making to develop the project and they do not like the idea. so, the idea will be dropped. Therefore, the individual work is sp pragmatic. Furthermore,the work can not be done quickly since it takes a long time to build agreements. they should convince the two influential with their ideas to end up with solving the problems. Finally, according to the rewarding is not true. the team group is less benefit from their work especially the member who makes a lot of efforts to solve the problems. As the result, he will not get any recognition, all of which appears that the individual work is better than the group work.
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 76
- TPO INTEGRATED 22 73
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 70
- TPO INTEGRATED 49 65
- YOUNG ADULTS SHOULD WORK PART TIME 70
Essay evaluation report
Not in a correct format.
The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture focus on dif...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... necessities in the work. In the reading , the writer presents the merits of the t...
^^
Line 1, column 534, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...y usually discuss the project together. thus, they are coming up with the correct de...
^^^^
Line 1, column 720, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to them to do it. they are sharing the ideas together and end up finishing the ...
^^
Line 1, column 789, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...inishing the tasks with a good quality. the team member who voices in making the de...
^^^
Line 1, column 959, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , group
... that is forced n them by other. Finally,group team can be very rewarding, they have t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1045, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he chance to get the promotion by making a great accomplishment in the work. ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a great accomplishment in the work. On the other hand, the speaker presents ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... project and they do not like the idea. so, the idea will be dropped. Therefore, t...
^^
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...vidual work is sp pragmatic. Furthermore,the work can not be done quickly since it t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... takes a long time to build agreements. they should convince the two influential wit...
^^^^
Line 3, column 747, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...according to the rewarding is not true. the team group is less benefit from their w...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'as to', 'in addition', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.216957605985 0.261695866417 83% => OK
Verbs: 0.167082294264 0.158904122519 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0498753117207 0.0723426182421 69% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0573566084788 0.0435111971325 132% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0448877805486 0.0277247811725 162% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0947630922693 0.128828473217 74% => OK
Participles: 0.0498753117207 0.0370669169778 135% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.59531932658 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0349127182045 0.0208969081088 167% => OK
Particles: 0.00997506234414 0.00154638098197 645% => OK
Determiners: 0.152119700748 0.128158765124 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0174563591022 0.0158828679856 110% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0199501246883 0.0114777025283 174% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2074.0 1645.83664459 126% => OK
No of words: 358.0 271.125827815 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79329608939 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.04852973271 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.307262569832 0.374372842146 82% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.231843575419 0.287516216867 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.159217877095 0.187439937562 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106145251397 0.113142543107 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59531932658 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477653631285 0.539623497131 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.6844163961 53.8517498576 92% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0529801325 161% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0476190476 21.7502111507 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.696987178 49.3711431718 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7619047619 132.220823453 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0476190476 21.7502111507 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.878197800319 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.09492273731 49% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 3.39072847682 354% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 40.2319765895 50.5018328374 80% => OK
Elegance: 1.34259259259 1.90840788429 70% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.635429375819 0.549887131256 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111964043375 0.142949733639 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0921112503796 0.0787303798458 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.557399016404 0.631733273073 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.116366329089 0.139662658121 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.293351235633 0.266732575781 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869450917561 0.103435571967 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.765801108274 0.414875509568 185% => Paragraphs have same ideas.
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0 0.0530846634433 0% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.58957493872 0.40443939384 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00625993804139 0.0528353158467 12% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 3.49668874172 229% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 10.2958057395 165% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Not in a correct format.
The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%) but more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.