Some think that buildings should be constructed with functionality in mind, as it is more importance than design. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, having the modern architecture with an abstract design become a status symbol for particular any region or the country. Nevertheless, some traditionalists claim that in order to give a unique and magnificent look ,the basic intended functionality of particular any building is ignored. To my mind, as attractive architecture become a prerequisite, especially in the 21st century, the repugnant impacts can be addressed by the government with the precise administration.
To begin with, people throughout the word , particular in western culture, easily get influenced by the unique building architectures. As a result of this, the region - with abstract buildings - can gradually transform to the tourist trap and sometimes, it plays a vital role in providing support to the economic structure of the region. Seen in this light, the unique architecture is absolutely needed in order to get monetary benefits and to stay in limelights.
On the other hand, the architecturer , sometimes, gives the priority to the outlook only rather than the basic reliability and robustness of the building.By this, often, the building needs a maintenance in the short duration. Not even this, the buildings more than 100 storeys needs other additional amenities such as powerful lifts, oxygen level maintenance, and so on.The Grand Bhuj Khalifa in the Dubai - city of gold - is a perfect example for this. Thus, the regional government and engineers need to work excessively behind the construction and maintenance of such unprecedented abstractions.
In a nutshell, the cited evidence supports my view that as we cannot stay isolated by constructing same square boxes in the city, the unique and abstract building structure is the must, in the local region. In the future, by the use of aforementioned approaches, we may mitigate the pernicious impacts of it, as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-20 | darshilbhayani92 | 84 | view |
- Nowadays many women are joining the police and military forces. however, some people believe that these jobs are not suitable for women discussed. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- some experts say that it is better for children to Hindi learning a foreign language at primary school rather than Secondary School. do you think so and take advantages and disadvantages with your opinion. 73
- Co2 emissions in between 1967 and 2007. 73
- Transportation mode in one European country. 84
- hould museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public, or should a charge, even a voluntary charge, be levied for admittance? Discuss this issue, and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...er to give a unique and magnificent look ,the basic intended functionality of part...
^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o begin with, people throughout the word , particular in western culture, easily g...
^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... On the other hand, the architecturer , sometimes, gives the priority to the ou...
^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...iability and robustness of the building.By this, often, the building needs a maint...
^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ts, oxygen level maintenance, and so on.The Grand Bhuj Khalifa in the Dubai - city ...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'look', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'such as', 'as a result', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238805970149 0.247107183377 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.0925373134328 0.155533422707 59% => OK
Adjectives: 0.122388059701 0.0946595960268 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0537313432836 0.0501214627716 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0179104477612 0.0437548338989 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125373134328 0.122226691241 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0238805970149 0.0403226058552 59% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.24457081352 2.80594681477 116% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0268656716418 0.0326793684256 82% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.15223880597 0.0861772015684 177% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0149253731343 0.021408717616 70% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.011925033212 0% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1869.0 1933.35771543 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 316.048096192 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27181208054 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385906040268 0.374742101984 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.298657718121 0.28420135186 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.251677852349 0.203846283523 123% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.177852348993 0.137316102897 130% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24457081352 2.80594681477 116% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.037074148 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577181208054 0.56093040696 103% => OK
Word variations: 61.8603839943 60.7387585426 102% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0891783567 68% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0909090909 20.7743622355 130% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4852794388 49.517814964 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.909090909 127.492653851 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.7743622355 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.814263465372 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.99599198397 125% => OK
Readability: 56.956680903 49.1944974215 116% => OK
Elegance: 2.36363636364 1.69124875643 140% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138287023767 0.332605444948 42% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.144122918672 0.102741220458 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.059735409046 0.0668466124924 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.699548048277 0.534860350844 131% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0996632150062 0.148594505496 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837199701261 0.134430193775 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361789466472 0.0742795772207 49% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.501952076895 0.324371583561 155% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0145427977668 0.0638462369009 23% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113191725145 0.228012699653 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397522991908 0.058150111329 68% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.5751503006 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.4468937876 77% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.