With the improvement of people's living standards, more goods nowadays are consumed, thereby generating more wastes which are only partly recycled. I think enacting some laws is helpful to mitigate the problem, but it should not be the only solution.
Laws can regulate people's behaviour. If detailed rules about recycling the waste are introduced, more people will follow the regulations, because many people today don't pay too much attention to the waste. Citizens will receive punishment after the introduction of regulations, if they throw the waste instead of recycling it. In this way, the public can form a good habit of recycling.
However, excessive regulations are sometimes too complex for the public to follow. For example, if people need to spend a lot of efforts recycling the waste in order to follow the rules, it might reduce their enthusiasm in the waste recycling process. As a consequence, the government may not accomplish its original objectives of imposing these laws.
In my opinion, some other solutions could also contribute positively to the recycling programmes. For example, some environmental groups should take the responsibility for improving ordinary people's environmental awareness. In this way, the public may realise the importance of recycling the waste. Also, the educational system should include classes about how to recycle the waste correctly. Students can gain basic skills about recycling at school and teach their parents to use these skills at home.
In conclusion, laws are useful for regulating people's behaviour on recycling, but other solutions should also be introduced to deal with the problem.
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 34
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued productio 50
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 50
- The following appeared in the health section of a magazine on trends and lifestyles:"People who use the artificial sweetener aspartame are better off consuming sugar, since aspartame can actually contribute to weight gain rather than weight loss. For exam 80
- TPO 29 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... regulations, because many people today dont pay too much attention to the waste. Ci...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242214532872 0.247107183377 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.176470588235 0.155533422707 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0657439446367 0.0946595960268 69% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0588235294118 0.0501214627716 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0311418685121 0.0437548338989 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.110726643599 0.122226691241 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0657439446367 0.0403226058552 163% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88231525382 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0311418685121 0.0326793684256 95% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.110726643599 0.0861772015684 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0449826989619 0.021408717616 210% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.00692041522491 0.011925033212 58% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1658.0 1933.35771543 86% => OK
No of words: 257.0 316.048096192 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.4513618677 6.12580529183 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20517956788 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.412451361868 0.374742101984 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.315175097276 0.28420135186 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.249027237354 0.203846283523 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.182879377432 0.137316102897 133% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88231525382 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.037074148 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591439688716 0.56093040696 105% => OK
Word variations: 61.3627826529 60.7387585426 101% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.1333333333 20.7743622355 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1642600118 49.517814964 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.533333333 127.492653851 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.7743622355 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.733333333333 0.814263465372 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 48.650843061 49.1944974215 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.57142857143 1.69124875643 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416571020585 0.332605444948 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0823480061016 0.102741220458 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0611174173564 0.0668466124924 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.559531361027 0.534860350844 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.18818561238 0.148594505496 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162579455977 0.134430193775 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748276992006 0.0742795772207 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.357089181811 0.324371583561 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.102662113224 0.0638462369009 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2669172726 0.228012699653 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644049625468 0.058150111329 111% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.68436873747 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 2.5751503006 272% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.4468937876 144% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.