As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
In all actuality, I think it is more probable that our bodies will surely deteriorate long
before our minds do in any significant amount. Who can’t say that technology has
made us lazier, but that’s the key word, lazy, not stupid. The ever increasing amount of
technology that we incorporate into our daily lives makes people think and learn every
day, possibly more than ever before. Our abilities to think, learn, philosophize, etc. may
even reach limits never dreamed of before by average people. Using technology to
solve problems will continue to help us realize our potential as a human race.
If you think about it, using technology to solve more complicating problems gives
humans a chance to expand their thinking and learning, opening up whole new
worlds for many people. Many of these people are glad for the chance to expand their
horizons by learning more, going to new places, and trying new things. If it wasn’t for
the invention of new technological devices, I wouldn’t be sitting at this computer
trying to philosophize about technology. It would be extremely hard for children in
much poorer countries to learn and think for themselves with out the invention of the
internet. Think what an impact the printing press, a technologically superior mackine
at the time, had on the ability of the human race to learn and think.
Right now we are seeing a golden age of technology, using it all the time during our
every day lives. When we get up there’s instant coffee and the microwave and all these
great things that help us get ready for our day. But we aren’t allowing our minds to
deteriorate by using them, we are only making things easier for ourselves and saving
time for other important things in our days. Going off to school or work in our cars
instead of a horse and buggy. Think of the brain power and genius that was used to come
up with that single invention that has changed the way we move across this globe.
Using technology to solve our continually more complicated problems as a human
race is definately a good thing. Our ability to think for ourselves isn’t deteriorating, it’s
continuing to grow, moving on to higher though functions and more ingenious ideas.
The ability to use what technology we have is an example
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- GRE Argument: An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, far 62
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with out stations's coverage of weath 54
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 14, column 57, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...tries to learn and think for themselves with out the invention of the internet. Think w...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'i think']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.190889370933 0.240241500013 79% => OK
Verbs: 0.184381778742 0.157235817809 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0824295010846 0.0880659088768 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0498915401302 0.0497285424764 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0780911062907 0.0444667217837 176% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.110629067245 0.12292977631 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0498915401302 0.0406280797675 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71281680178 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0390455531453 0.030933414821 126% => OK
Particles: 0.00650759219089 0.0016655270985 391% => OK
Determiners: 0.0715835140998 0.0997080785238 72% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0108459869848 0.0249443105267 43% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0151843817787 0.0148568991511 102% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2314.0 2732.02544248 85% => OK
No of words: 392.0 452.878318584 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90306122449 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.326530612245 0.366273622748 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.214285714286 0.280924506359 76% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.160714285714 0.200843997647 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.122448979592 0.132149295362 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71281680178 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 219.290929204 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.48968727796 114% => OK
Word variations: 63.705845033 55.4138127331 115% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.6315789474 23.380412469 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2584156911 59.4972553346 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.789473684 141.124799967 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6315789474 23.380412469 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.263157894737 0.674092028746 39% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 27.0 4.94800884956 546% => There are something wrong with the essay format.
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 42.0601503759 51.4728631049 82% => OK
Elegance: 1.125 1.64882698954 68% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49695177335 0.391690518653 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.125181374619 0.123202303941 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0968958049932 0.077325440228 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.73689210691 0.547984918172 134% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.24703930318 0.149214159877 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173062737929 0.161403998019 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849693119046 0.0892212321368 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.0875851258936 0.385218514788 23% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0412024811786 0.0692045440612 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150087360216 0.275328986314 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848475894434 0.0653680567796 130% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.