Government funding for pure science endeavors, such as space exploration, should be reduced in order to direcct more funding towards humanitarian science projects.
Write a response in which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to consider specific instances for which this statement may or may not be true.
The primary purpose of any government is to serve it’s citizens and humanity as a whole. The first right on the funding of the government is, no doubt, in the causes that can ameliorate and enhance the life of the human beings. While I completely agree that government must fund all the humanitarian science project to the best of its capacity, I do not second the idea of reducing funds from pure science endeavors. This is a complex issue that involves a gamut of situations and cases. Although, humanitarian projects are more cardinal, whether to reduce funding from the scientific endeavors depends whether government has enough funding to fund both or there is a trade off between the two.
Government recieve taxes from the money earned by the country’s citizens. Therefore, welfare of it’s citizens is the primary concern for the government. Since, humanitarian projects help to make life of the people better, it becomes a concern at greater priority than the pure science endeavors. For example, inorder to develop treatment for diseases like cancer, ebola etc research need a lot of funds. So, it is the responsibility of the government to fund these non-profit causes for the sole purpose it has come to power. Hence, the humanitarian projects must be well funded by the government.
However, the scientific endeavours bring money to the government. They bring power and scientific advancement. This advancement in science would come to the rescue for humanitarian project as well indirectly, in ways that can not be predetermined. This is how scientific developments take place. For example, if the government launches spaceship to the Mars, it contributes in pushing the boundaries of the existing scientific knowledge. It gets recognition and respect in the international platform for these things. They can share their state-of-the-art technology with other nations in lieu of some economic favours in kind. This helps in advancement and growth of the nation as a whole. The entire population therein is benifitted with this. Although, it doesnot seem to have a direct impact on humanity, it does serve teh nation in indirect ways. Therefore, the government must try to fund the scientific endeavours as well untill and unless they come at the cost of more direct humanitarian projects.
Furthermore, the decision of funding depends upon whether there is trade off between teh two things or not. If not, the governmnet must not reduce funds from the scientific endeavors for humanitarian project. Moreover, there can be other less important areas from where the funds can be cut. This would depend upon country to country on what are the pressing needs and what is the priority for their particular situation. For example, for a third world nation, the government has more serious issues of poverty and hunger to deal with before investing on any kind of scientific foray. Thus, every case is diffecent and the decision must be on the basis of the specific needs.
To sum, humanitarian projects must be given edge over the scientific endeavours. But the government must try to fund the later as well, since, they bring a lot other kind of benefits to the nation and the citizens as whole. Every nation has different needs, and their funding must be delineated on case by case basis depending upon their priorities.
- Claim: In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimal role in private business matters.Write an essay in which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to use most compelling rea 50
- In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers CleanAll was found to remove 40 more dirt and kill 30 more bacteria than the next best cleanser Furthermore a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with cleanAll used far fewer 81
- People should question the rule of authority as opposed to accepting them passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 72
- Airline industry representatives have recently argued that flying is safer than driving, citing two seperate studies. First, US statistics show that each year there are approximately 40,000 deathsin automobile accidentsverss only approximately 200 in flig 66
- The fact that technology is outpacing the needs of those in cultures that can afford the technology creates cultures of excessive consumerism.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
... for these things. They can share their state of the art technology with other nations in lieu o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 128, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...e government must try to fund the later as well, since, they bring a lot other kin...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'kind of', 'no doubt']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.2528 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.1328 0.157235817809 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0768 0.0880659088768 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0432 0.0497285424764 87% => OK
Pronouns: 0.032 0.0444667217837 72% => OK
Prepositions: 0.1328 0.12292977631 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0224 0.0406280797675 55% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84692130901 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0288 0.030933414821 93% => OK
Particles: 0.0016 0.0016655270985 96% => OK
Determiners: 0.1232 0.0997080785238 124% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.024 0.0249443105267 96% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0112 0.0148568991511 75% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3353.0 2732.02544248 123% => OK
No of words: 553.0 452.878318584 122% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06329113924 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.58838876751 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.358047016275 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28390596745 0.280924506359 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198915009042 0.200843997647 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146473779385 0.132149295362 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84692130901 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 219.290929204 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452079566004 0.48968727796 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 53.3333058927 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 31.0 20.6194690265 150% => OK
Sentence length: 17.8387096774 23.380412469 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7311202293 59.4972553346 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.161290323 141.124799967 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8387096774 23.380412469 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.548387096774 0.674092028746 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 46.2293064224 51.4728631049 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.96153846154 1.64882698954 119% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293363510963 0.391690518653 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.10383820927 0.123202303941 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0629381227011 0.077325440228 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.490582736769 0.547984918172 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.141880819567 0.149214159877 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10991410679 0.161403998019 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566201535901 0.0892212321368 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.508640876672 0.385218514788 132% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0517302614271 0.0692045440612 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211094241847 0.275328986314 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499075862228 0.0653680567796 76% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 17.0 4.88274336283 348% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.