Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion
At the turn of the new century, with the development of human’s modern society and galloping rate of science and technology, more and more people tend to expand their cities. There are unlimited ways to develop cities; one of which is destroying old buildings and replacing them with modern buildings. Although some people believe modern buildings can have profound effects on the blooming and thriving the society, I am in the conviction that we should preserve historical buildings due to they are symbol of our culture and can attract more tourists.
The first aspect to point out is that what provokes people to maintain historical buildings is preserving their culture. It goes without saying that historical emblem help us to understand not only where we came from, but also how our ancestors lived. There is no doubt that, people’ custom which live in different parts of a country varies from city to city. To clarify more, consider the difference of people’s cultures which live in Tehran and Isfahan. Since People in Tehran are busy with their jobs and reluctant to socialize with their family, they almost live in small apartment; however, Esfahan’s people have strong emotional bonds with their families and have big houses. Moreover, they can be used as educational assistance to help history teachers. Students can go to these old buildings and learn about their history instead of just attending class and listening to the historical stories.
A further more subtle point is that historical monuments can attract a large number of tourists from different parts of the world. It is noteworthy that tourists come to our city not only for natural beauties, but also for visiting historical places to broaden their horizons about other cities’ culture. To illustrate more, take the case of Eiffle tower in Paris which annually attracts many tourists from inside and outside of France for instance. Tourists bring more money to Paris, so it revolutionizes people’s lives over there. This money could be used to preserve and renovate such buildings. Additionally, a city becomes well known among other parts and this increases chances of getting more funds and investments. Hence, old buildings can improve tourism industry.
In a nutshell, it is obvious that the modern society has gone through some changes by the enormous impacts of tending to modernism. Although constructing new buildings can help prosper a nation, destroy old buildings is not a good solution. In fact, how people who live in a modern society can get familiar with their culture in the past? How young people can recognize of their personality? How a city can attract new tourists? Undoubtedly, answers all of these question are conserving old building.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | ashish150395 | 60 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | sena | 71 | view |
| 2019-05-27 | Hà Phúc Khang | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | osfallatah89 | 70 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | ayush.rga | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement? Games are as important for adults as they are for children. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- integrated 48 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Advertising can tell you a lot about a country. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Some believe that one should spend more time being far away from the people we care about, because it is necessary for people to understand the importance of relationship of people we care about, while others think being away from people we care about can 73
- Do you agree to plan a course for university students: "Speaking in front of public" 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s that historical monuments can attract a large number of tourists from different parts of the wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'for instance', 'in fact', 'no doubt']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.23828125 0.229887763892 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.15625 0.158761421928 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.1015625 0.0866891130778 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.041015625 0.046263068375 89% => OK
Pronouns: 0.046875 0.0685040099705 68% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119140625 0.118717715034 100% => OK
Participles: 0.033203125 0.0351676179071 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.76024928624 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.03515625 0.0309702414327 114% => OK
Particles: 0.001953125 0.00188951952338 103% => OK
Determiners: 0.0625 0.0887237588012 70% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0234375 0.0209618222197 112% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.021484375 0.0139019557991 155% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2767.0 2387.08602151 116% => OK
No of words: 447.0 408.028673835 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.19015659955 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.387024608501 0.338922669872 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.308724832215 0.251872472559 123% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.219239373602 0.174417080927 126% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.147651006711 0.112833075102 131% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76024928624 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534675615213 0.524397521467 102% => OK
Word variations: 62.4833571778 59.2087087015 106% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6684587814 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.4347826087 20.5533526081 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3164719043 48.84282405 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.304347826 120.699889404 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4347826087 20.5533526081 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.521739130435 0.644075263715 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 50.3072658302 45.7405998639 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.6 1.45489161554 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265177672687 0.300154397459 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.111368320879 0.103427244359 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.073502867793 0.0752933317313 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.441407704798 0.497263757937 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.136567068064 0.151897553556 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997549407705 0.114077575197 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759030534466 0.0781384742642 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.370300085663 0.336927656856 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0900277914183 0.067059652881 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192621642101 0.210909579961 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614840002618 0.0618886996521 99% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.91756272401 163% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.