Paragraph shows that the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico were notable for their great houses and Archaeologists discovered possible theories about the use of the great buildings. Whereas lecture cast doubts on the opinion proposed in paragraph.
First reason explained in the paragraph is that buildings had been used for residential purpose with hundreds of people in one housing and recent development like apartments is also depicting the glimpse of earlier residential area. Contrary to this opinion, lecture says that building was looking like apartment from outside but inside scenario was different. He supports his explanation with the help of counts of fire places. There were only few fire places inside which were not sufficient for hundreds of people.
Second theory in paragraph says that building had been used for store food supplies because main crop maize could store for longer time and used as a long lasting food. Whereas lecture raises point against this evidence by looking the condition of the grain maize because maize was spilled on the floor and excavation were not covered. It should be in big containers with covered lids.
Thirdly, paragraph delineates that buildings had been used as ceremonial centers and evidence is enormous mound formed by a pile of old materials like broken pots. Casting doubt on this explanation, lecture show that buildings were filled with building construction materials and mounds of sand and room could be used as trash of constructions. Regarding broken pots lying in the room lecturer says that the broken pots were used by the construction people who were having meals in that area.
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 80
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 83
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 76
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 76
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s about the use of the great buildings. Whereas lecture cast doubts on the opinion prop...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'long lasting food'.
Suggestion: long lasting food
...could store for longer time and used as a long lasting food. Whereas lecture raises point against t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'regarding', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'whereas']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.336879432624 0.261695866417 129% => OK
Verbs: 0.170212765957 0.158904122519 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0957446808511 0.0723426182421 132% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0177304964539 0.0435111971325 41% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0141843971631 0.0277247811725 51% => OK
Prepositions: 0.187943262411 0.128828473217 146% => OK
Participles: 0.0744680851064 0.0370669169778 201% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.61702629089 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00354609929078 0.0208969081088 17% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0673758865248 0.128158765124 53% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0106382978723 0.0158828679856 67% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00709219858156 0.0114777025283 62% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1654.0 1645.83664459 100% => OK
No of words: 267.0 271.125827815 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.19475655431 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.38202247191 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.292134831461 0.287516216867 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198501872659 0.187439937562 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12734082397 0.113142543107 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61702629089 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.539623497131 106% => OK
Word variations: 58.8139566876 53.8517498576 109% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.25 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0610771982 49.3711431718 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.833333333 132.220823453 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 0.878197800319 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 51.4634831461 50.5018328374 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.9649122807 1.90840788429 155% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.636131396371 0.549887131256 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0944467247085 0.142949733639 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0668561790517 0.0787303798458 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.54517361872 0.631733273073 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147615157761 0.139662658121 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.24641187177 0.266732575781 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136827034074 0.103435571967 132% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.276317045929 0.414875509568 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0180661180682 0.0530846634433 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.436332016274 0.40443939384 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392005002771 0.0528353158467 74% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.