Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably
The presence of unofficial online news from social media or blogosphere have neither jeorpadize the standard of covering news nor negatively affecting politics.
First, the government use official news site and channels to reach citizens, this is because the government is awre that people will definetly get the news through this channels. For instance, during campain and election process information you can find that people rely for offical information from channels like CNN, BBC. It is clearly that, presence of socila media doesnot affect people rely on well known official news sources. The society really on standard new channels to hear serious information.
Second, social media act a secondary source of information where the standard media can review and and get some leads/ clue for some of the information which they miss. Later, they can work further to know the truth of things they have not covered. Therefore, they support standard sources and not the vice versa.
Some argue that when anybody can publish his/her opinion will decline the standards for news. This is flawed. In fact, this offer society with an alternative explanation because some media could be in favor of only one side.
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably 41
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably 41
- Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably 50
- The Commercial airline industry in the country of Freedonia has experienced impressive growth in the past three years. This trend will surely continue in the years to come, since the airline industry will benefit from recent changes in Freedonian society: 70
- Progress should be the aim of any great society. People too often cling unnecessarily obsolete ways of thinking and acting because of both a high comfort level and a fear of the unknown. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ple will definetly get the news through this channels. For instance, during campain ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ion where the standard media can review and and get some leads/ clue for some of the in...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...review and and get some leads/ clue for some of the information which they miss. Later, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Therefore, they support standard sources and not the vice versa. Some argue th...
^^
Line 7, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the vice versa. Some argue that when anybody can publish his/her opinion wil...
^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sa. Some argue that when anybody can publish his/her opinion will decline the...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'for instance', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.279069767442 0.240241500013 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.13488372093 0.157235817809 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0790697674419 0.0880659088768 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0558139534884 0.0497285424764 112% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0279069767442 0.0444667217837 63% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120930232558 0.12292977631 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0232558139535 0.0406280797675 57% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.48622239053 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0139534883721 0.030933414821 45% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.111627906977 0.0997080785238 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0325581395349 0.0249443105267 131% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0139534883721 0.0148568991511 94% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1220.0 2732.02544248 45% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 195.0 452.878318584 43% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.25641025641 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.58838876751 81% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.389743589744 0.366273622748 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.302564102564 0.280924506359 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.189743589744 0.200843997647 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112820512821 0.132149295362 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48622239053 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 219.290929204 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620512820513 0.48968727796 127% => OK
Word variations: 60.863311704 55.4138127331 110% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6194690265 53% => OK
Sentence length: 17.7272727273 23.380412469 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0103294671 59.4972553346 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.909090909 141.124799967 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 23.380412469 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 0.674092028746 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 47.9836829837 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.93617021277 1.64882698954 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31221367194 0.391690518653 80% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108884763013 0.123202303941 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0631715070351 0.077325440228 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.569414338085 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.190301147329 0.149214159877 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125473347538 0.161403998019 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813638252761 0.0892212321368 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.184108301475 0.385218514788 48% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0337963941425 0.0692045440612 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210948179307 0.275328986314 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380381965506 0.0653680567796 58% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 13.5995575221 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.