People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author's statement here is partially correct, because any decision that we take can be based on emotional attachment with the family and near ones or logically depends on the benefits that a person will get from any particular thing. Decision making plays an important role in everyone's life as each one of us has to consider many things, as in the consequences of the taking a particular side.
The statement is valid only in some of the cases but not all. There are some people who take decisions emotionally just maintain or preserve the memories attached with it. Like, in selling an old property which is of no use in the present day. A person and its family will definitely not want to sell the old property because it will take away all the cherished memories of the house from them. So they decide not to sell the property and keep it as it is and preserve the memories. Here the person thinks emotionally but takes a right decision as it keeps the whole family happy.
Similarly, if anyone wants to renovate his old house where they had many good memories, like functions, festivals etc. then he might definitely not want to renovate it, but the condition of the house is very bad and needs attention. So in the case if the person goes with the emotional attachment then he will end up with a bad decision. This supports the author's statement and will make the person poor decision maker.
The author statement is true only in some cases but not all, so the statement can be rewritten as "People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are sometimes poor decision makers."
In conclusion, the author says that the people who take decision emotionally are always poor decision makers which is actually wrong.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | GREprep021219 | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | rajeshrawal | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | amusnakate | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Hitzee | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 50
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible. Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time. Which of these situations do you think is better? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinio 65
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
The authors statement here is partially correct, be...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...side. The statement is valid only in some of the cases but not all. There are some peopl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... with a bad decision. This supports the authors statement and will make the person poor...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'if', 'similarly', 'so', 'then', 'as to', 'in conclusion', 'in some cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.204142011834 0.240241500013 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.150887573964 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.085798816568 0.0880659088768 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0739644970414 0.0497285424764 149% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0443786982249 0.0444667217837 100% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121301775148 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0207100591716 0.0406280797675 51% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58095965826 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0147928994083 0.030933414821 48% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00591715976331 0.0016655270985 355% => OK
Determiners: 0.133136094675 0.0997080785238 134% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0236686390533 0.0249443105267 95% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0177514792899 0.0148568991511 119% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1783.0 2732.02544248 65% => OK
No of words: 310.0 452.878318584 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75161290323 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.58838876751 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.306451612903 0.366273622748 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.232258064516 0.280924506359 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.2 0.200843997647 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125806451613 0.132149295362 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58095965826 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 219.290929204 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503225806452 0.48968727796 103% => OK
Word variations: 50.7354354558 55.4138127331 92% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6194690265 63% => OK
Sentence length: 23.8461538462 23.380412469 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.9442731698 59.4972553346 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.153846154 141.124799967 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 23.380412469 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.692307692308 0.674092028746 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 47.0719602978 51.4728631049 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.28571428571 1.64882698954 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431011187645 0.391690518653 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.150246794799 0.123202303941 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.097248651157 0.077325440228 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.62142363707 0.547984918172 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.186469723104 0.149214159877 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187828014419 0.161403998019 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102021365499 0.0892212321368 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.343568801187 0.385218514788 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.104517673991 0.0692045440612 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300844803754 0.275328986314 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662835908833 0.0653680567796 101% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.