The primary goal behind advancement of technologies is the benefit of mankind, and this is possible when the application of technology is expanded to other fields and domains. However, the speaker's statement that too much resources are expended for the new inventions, is somewhat exaggerated and misses on the point.
Consider the advent of computers and automation in today's world. Whatever be the domain or field, the use of computers has become indispensable. For example, in fields like biology and nueroscience, the computers have completely revolutionized the existing approaches and methodologies of research. Most of the medical tests use computers and other high end graphical simulations for diagnosis of various diseases. Thus, it is evident from all such domains, that the existing technology has proliferated into all other fields.
Besides the above evidence, different businesses and startups are launched daily to extend the application of existing technologies. For example, now one could do all his errands online: from ordering groceries online to make money transfers, sitting in the comfort of home. All of these services are based on common technological stack but serve completely different purposes. Thus, the business world is spending plenty of resources to make existing technology reachable to the common people. Though, the penetration is still low and such services are limited to urban and sub-urban areas, the government and other organizations are working hard to achieve the goal of making extant technology accessible to all. For example, recently many projects have been piloted by top firms like Google, Facebook in collaboration with the government to make internet accessible to even the remotest parts of the country.
Undoubtedly, expanding the use of existing technology is important, but the importance to innovate and develop new technology cannot be overlooked. Both the endeavors should go hand in hand, and the world should not witness stagnation in any domain. The responsibility to innovate and create new technologies is incumbent on scientists and research organizations, and undoubtedly they are doing a wonderful job. In few years, one would be surrounded by intelligent and completely autonomous robots, owing to the cutting edge research funded by the concerned organizations.
Thus, the balance between both the forces is required to reap maximum benefit from the innovations. Researchers and scientists should continue to innovate and create new technologies, while corporations and businesses should proliferate these technologies to all the domains maximizing the applications of these technologies.
- Argument: The United States of America should dispense with the Electoral College. At present, the President and Vice President are selected in a process that does not give equal weight to all voters. Apart from Maine and Nebraska, states select electoral 50
- Too much time money and energy are spent developing new and more elaborate technology Society should instead focus on maximizing the use of existing technology for the immediate benefit of its citizens GRE Issue 110 75
- "Sports stars & movie stars have an obligation to behave as role models for the young people who look up to them. In return for the millions of dollars that they are paid, we should expect them to fulfill this societal responsibility." -Write a response i 57
- ARGUMENT: Several charitable organizations in Pleasantville provide opportunities for teenagers to engage in community service. These organizations have a great need for volunteers, but in recent years, the number of teenage volunteers has significantly d 50
- A recent survey of 250 adults between 30-45 showed an association between the number of hours adults spend online each day and self reporting of symptoms commonly associated with depression. The survey found that adults who spend 30 hours or more online e 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speakers'' or 'speaker's'?
Suggestion: speakers'; speaker's
... other fields and domains. However, the speakers statement that too much resources are e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...owever, the speakers statement that too much resources are expended for the new inve...
^^^^
Line 7, column 491, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by intelligent and completely autonomous robots, owing to the cutting edge resear...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'while', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.2533632287 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.165919282511 0.157235817809 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100896860987 0.0880659088768 115% => OK
Adverbs: 0.042600896861 0.0497285424764 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0067264573991 0.0444667217837 15% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.107623318386 0.12292977631 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0650224215247 0.0406280797675 160% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.19137696142 2.79330140395 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0358744394619 0.030933414821 116% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.105381165919 0.0997080785238 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0156950672646 0.0249443105267 63% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00448430493274 0.0148568991511 30% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2668.0 2732.02544248 98% => OK
No of words: 401.0 452.878318584 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.65336658354 6.0361032391 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4463840399 0.366273622748 122% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.374064837905 0.280924506359 133% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.30174563591 0.200843997647 150% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.204488778055 0.132149295362 155% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19137696142 2.79330140395 114% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 219.290929204 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548628428928 0.48968727796 112% => OK
Word variations: 62.795296716 55.4138127331 113% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.1052631579 23.380412469 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0131719824 59.4972553346 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.421052632 141.124799967 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1052631579 23.380412469 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.526315789474 0.674092028746 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 58.5117469484 51.4728631049 114% => OK
Elegance: 1.97916666667 1.64882698954 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407061427191 0.391690518653 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0846666469567 0.123202303941 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0420281752821 0.077325440228 54% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.587714548952 0.547984918172 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124968443662 0.149214159877 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18029391509 0.161403998019 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630465762322 0.0892212321368 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.440790560078 0.385218514788 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0207641224939 0.0692045440612 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294948238036 0.275328986314 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344930156698 0.0653680567796 53% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.