The article states that nuclear enegry must be replaced with fossil fuels because of its merits and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explainst that the statments of the article are premature and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading posits that the fuel that powers nuclear plants is cheaper compared to the fossil fuels so it could save alot of money. The professor refutes this point by saying that even though the fuel is cheaper but the cost of bulding and maintaining the nuclear power plants are much more and in the long run, more money will be spent for obtaining nuclear power based energy. He also mentions that the emergency measures that have to be considered for using nuclear power cause significant cost.
Second, the article claims that the process of creating nuclear energy is relatively safe, however, the professor contends tha even though there are some safty measures for nuclear power plants but still accedents happen. He provides an example of a power plant in penselveinia to illustrate this point. According to the professor, an accedent happens in a power plant in Penselveynia city and even though no serious damege was done on life the people, but the cost of repairing it was very significant.
Third, the reading averst that the hazardous radioactive waste generated by nuclear power plants can be managed. The lecture opposes this point by saying that in the in the proccess which is explained in the passage the Polotainum 239 is produced which is very dangerous for the species. Also he mentions that not all the high-level waste will be used in the fuel reprocessing operation. Furthermore, the radio active waste should be buried in the ground very deeply and for ligal issuse they area in which they are buried must be without any sevilians so some lands must be remain unused.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 71
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 86
- Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what are the qualities of a good neighbor? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 60
- Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are 92
- Endangered Species Many environmentalists support the current system of laws that works to save all species that may become extinct. They claim that the current variety of organisms that exist on Earth must be preserved. This idea has long been held as o 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of repairing it was very significant. Third, the reading averst that the hazar...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'in the'.
Suggestion: in the
...cture opposes this point by saying that in the in the proccess which is explained in the pass...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...hich is very dangerous for the species. Also he mentions that not all the high-level...
^^^^
Line 7, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...operation. Furthermore, the radio active waste should be buried in the ground ver...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'third']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241791044776 0.261695866417 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.179104477612 0.158904122519 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0835820895522 0.0723426182421 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0537313432836 0.0435111971325 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0238805970149 0.0277247811725 86% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134328358209 0.128828473217 104% => OK
Participles: 0.065671641791 0.0370669169778 177% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.46353019145 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0119402985075 0.0208969081088 57% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.131343283582 0.128158765124 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0238805970149 0.0158828679856 150% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0119402985075 0.0114777025283 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1871.0 1645.83664459 114% => OK
No of words: 313.0 271.125827815 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97763578275 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.370607028754 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.268370607029 0.287516216867 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.159744408946 0.187439937562 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0990415335463 0.113142543107 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46353019145 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517571884984 0.539623497131 96% => OK
Word variations: 52.9555389837 53.8517498576 98% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0833333333 21.7502111507 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6373270314 49.3711431718 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.916666667 132.220823453 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 21.7502111507 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.878197800319 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 52.9203940362 50.5018328374 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.72093023256 1.90840788429 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30520998543 0.549887131256 56% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.164091096509 0.142949733639 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0669177174706 0.0787303798458 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.663182669102 0.631733273073 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.12218904043 0.139662658121 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162779909108 0.266732575781 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760936994379 0.103435571967 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.435314504412 0.414875509568 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0570343022679 0.0530846634433 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247964293958 0.40443939384 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638671261094 0.0528353158467 121% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.