EVERY INDIVIDUAL IN A SOCIETY HAS A RESPONSIBILITY TO OBEY JUST LAWS AND TO DISOBEY AND RESIST UNJUST LAWS.
From the dawn of civilization, one term has always been highly debatable and seems so elusive that holding a grasp seems virtually impossible is "just". After all how can one define such word which is highly subjective: different person are driven by different sets of morals, tradition and code of ethics: the thing which seem just in one backyard may seem utterly drivel in others. For simply the fact, that there has not been any sorts of solid benchmark to determine the just , I cannot agree with the statement that all humanity has to obey just laws , which any case seems far too extreme for simply justification.
The laws are made by humans, which means the justness and implication is highly malleable and not free from biasness. The term is very powerful that while used with evil intentions and with trickery and cunningness is a very much persuasive. We can see many examples where the powerful and dominant countries and personals have simply justified their wrongdoings to be just and for the good of the country and future welfare. When Galileo - a famous scientist - who presented and demonstrated his ideas and philosophy that its the Earth that rotates around the sun and infact sun is the focal point of solar system was incardinated in his own house for the rest of his life: though he was correct, he was against the law of that time which seemed just for the others.
Similarly, in the case of Hitler and The Nazi Germany who convinced that war was the only solution and hovered the nation and the world towards a catastrophic world war was simply not just but rather appeared so at that time and era and to the people. So, it is not easy to define the justness as it is highly related to personal conception, ideology and as said earlier the morals, ethics, and the traditions and beliefs.
However, there are some laws which must be followed in any case simply to avoid the devastation and mayhem or chaos. As such, in the case of traffic lights. Irrespective of what you or I have an opinion about it, we must follow -not for the world or betterness- merely for own safety. Other issues like human right, child right , anti-racism all are the just laws or ethics one must follow .
In conclusion, it is highly personal and subjective to define just and unjust laws either we should follow or restrict it. Due to the lack of hallmark for what’s just, it is always seen that the wrong kind of people mislead and persuade in the name of justness. It is, in no possible ways, must to follow the just laws but having said that there are some laws like traffic rules and human and child and racism issues which must certainly be followed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Nicole Metzner | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Abhipray Singh | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | ali.rs | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | ali.rs | 66 | view |
- People pursuing intellectual interest for personal reasons are more likely to benefit the society than people who act for public good. 70
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- "The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station. 'Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complai 50
- EVERY INDIVIDUAL IN A SOCIETY HAS A RESPONSIBILITY TO OBEY JUST LAWS AND TO DISOBEY AND RESIST UNJUST LAWS. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 490, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...of solid benchmark to determine the just , I cannot agree with the statement that ...
^^
Line 1, column 566, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... that all humanity has to obey just laws , which any case seems far too extreme fo...
^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...onstrated his ideas and philosophy that its the Earth that rotates around the sun a...
^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hovered the nation and the world towards a catastrophic world war was simply not ...
^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...her issues like human right, child right , anti-racism all are the just laws or et...
^^
Line 7, column 390, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the just laws or ethics one must follow . In conclusion, it is highly personal...
^^
Line 9, column 296, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...f justness. It is, in no possible ways, must to follow the just laws but having said th...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'similarly', 'so', 'while', 'after all', 'as to', 'in conclusion', 'kind of', 'in any case']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217142857143 0.240241500013 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.137142857143 0.157235817809 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0761904761905 0.0880659088768 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0838095238095 0.0497285424764 169% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0380952380952 0.0444667217837 86% => OK
Prepositions: 0.110476190476 0.12292977631 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0247619047619 0.0406280797675 61% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.51854347211 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0190476190476 0.030933414821 62% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0952380952381 0.0997080785238 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0190476190476 0.0249443105267 76% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0285714285714 0.0148568991511 192% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2682.0 2732.02544248 98% => OK
No of words: 478.0 452.878318584 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61087866109 6.0361032391 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.290794979079 0.366273622748 79% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.194560669456 0.280924506359 69% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.138075313808 0.200843997647 69% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0899581589958 0.132149295362 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51854347211 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 219.290929204 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504184100418 0.48968727796 103% => OK
Word variations: 58.6138314756 55.4138127331 106% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 29.875 23.380412469 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.949507459 59.4972553346 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.625 141.124799967 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 23.380412469 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.674092028746 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 49.3310669456 51.4728631049 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.36029411765 1.64882698954 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279042525248 0.391690518653 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.126238867845 0.123202303941 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0596213876699 0.077325440228 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.622314513409 0.547984918172 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.11996274014 0.149214159877 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140660687775 0.161403998019 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833411239316 0.0892212321368 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.42748593166 0.385218514788 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.118485556053 0.0692045440612 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209554888527 0.275328986314 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659575359425 0.0653680567796 101% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.4325221239 29% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.30420353982 170% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 7.22455752212 28% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 9.0 3.66592920354 246% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.