Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position
Time and again humans have depleted natural resources, laid waste to forests, destroyed natural environments to accommodate its ever increasing population. A lot of today's modern cities are based on previous human settlements around a water source or over a forest of some kind, usually by displacing the existing fauna that already existed at that place.
Over a century ago, the plethora of flora that existed all around the world was enough to sustain the populace of earth. There was an ecological balance, rains came down at appropriate times, and there were not much cities. Why deforestation today is a bad idea is profoundly emphasized by current weather patterns. Agricultural clocks are changing, expectant georgian sectors are almost always hit by the change in weather, either facing an acute shortage of water, or on the other extreme end, floods.
And it is not just the agriculture that is affected by the incessant deforestation. Trees bind the soil, provide the much needed oxygen for the massive human race, and are symbiotic with the regional fauna. Destroying trees to make way for more area for humans to live destroys the balance in the food pyramid. Herbivorous forms of life are primarily dependent on wilderness, and similarly carnivorous forms require a requisite amount of herbivores. Affecting the base of the pyramid affects all other life forms, directly or indirectly.
On the large scale, widespread deforestation also leads to greenhouse effect, which in turn leads to ice depletion at the polar caps, change in rain patterns, and subsequent global warming.
Clearing the wilderness to give more people a place to live, from an economical standpoint, stabilizes the society. Housing is one of the primary needs of the society, and needless to say, without enough space for housing, the society would be in havoc. The sections of the economy dependent on wood or land, like real estate and furniture, are, additionally bolstered, and statistically this trend has been shown to correlate with the amount of deforestation.
Overall, the judgement of today's governments over clearing of forests is clearly vital in determining the fate of the large fauna that is usually dependent on the same. Taking a firm stand to preserve the environment for the future generations is the critical question - with which our history, present and the future is intertwined.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | KarinaShine | 83 | view |
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 66
- Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...t appropriate times, and there were not much cities. Why deforestation today is a ba...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'similarly', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25462962963 0.240241500013 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.148148148148 0.157235817809 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.106481481481 0.0880659088768 121% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0532407407407 0.0497285424764 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00694444444444 0.0444667217837 16% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.118055555556 0.12292977631 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0462962962963 0.0406280797675 114% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87177188282 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0277777777778 0.030933414821 90% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.115740740741 0.0997080785238 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00231481481481 0.0249443105267 9% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0162037037037 0.0148568991511 109% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2397.0 2732.02544248 88% => OK
No of words: 386.0 452.878318584 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.20984455959 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.391191709845 0.366273622748 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.295336787565 0.280924506359 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.217616580311 0.200843997647 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.145077720207 0.132149295362 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87177188282 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 219.290929204 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616580310881 0.48968727796 126% => OK
Word variations: 76.2941029604 55.4138127331 138% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 22.7058823529 23.380412469 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5968437455 59.4972553346 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 141.124799967 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7058823529 23.380412469 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.235294117647 0.674092028746 35% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 52.2395611094 51.4728631049 101% => OK
Elegance: 2.01111111111 1.64882698954 122% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250362318236 0.391690518653 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113099968184 0.123202303941 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0809647207281 0.077325440228 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.589031261585 0.547984918172 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176942471194 0.149214159877 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107942075039 0.161403998019 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602703428227 0.0892212321368 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.311053691745 0.385218514788 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.106821297119 0.0692045440612 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164227779258 0.275328986314 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526429886376 0.0653680567796 81% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.