It is a controversial topic to find which is more important for a successful future job. Student should have both the attributes so that he/she can account well to people as well as maintains good command in the study. Discussion and interaction with the people requires ability but execution in the work will depend on the basic understanding. Deciding about the importance, I think weight age will be more for ability to relate well to people in compare to studying hard in the school.
Today's workaholic culture is completely depended on the team work where you need skills so that you can relate well and interact well. Firstly, for getting a job requires interview which means interaction. People should have ability so that he/she can relate well to others and impression could be positive according to the ability. What is the use of knowledge if we can not express how to relate? It is obvious to have some qualities so that ideas, thoughts can be deliver in a proper way. Most of the jobs are relying on service based platform where it is must to have capability to account well to the customers. There is no need to worry about the study because most of the companies provide training about the work and execution. People can reach higher only with the good aptitude because they can relate well to others who can push towards success.
Do we need to ignore study in school? I guess no. Basic understanding about the subject comes from the study only. Execution in the work always requires school knowledge. Schools are meant to study and student should more focus on the study to build solid platform.
People should learn ability to relate well to get into the job and study also to execute the work well. Ability is the covering similarly study supports the internal aspects. Student should aware of both to get success in the future jobs.
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 65
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 76
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 76
- TPO-04 - Integrated Writing Task Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is wa 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... that he/she can account well to people as well as maintains good command in the study. Di...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 475, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... so that ideas, thoughts can be deliver in a proper way. Most of the jobs are relying on servic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 559, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...g on service based platform where it is must to have capability to account well to the ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'similarly', 'so', 'well', 'i guess', 'i think', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234104046243 0.229887763892 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.190751445087 0.158761421928 120% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0520231213873 0.0866891130778 60% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0664739884393 0.046263068375 144% => OK
Pronouns: 0.028901734104 0.0685040099705 42% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106936416185 0.118717715034 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0346820809249 0.0351676179071 99% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.48214975225 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0606936416185 0.0309702414327 196% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0982658959538 0.0887237588012 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0491329479769 0.0209618222197 234% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0202312138728 0.0139019557991 146% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1853.0 2387.08602151 78% => OK
No of words: 323.0 408.028673835 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73684210526 5.86048508987 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48200974243 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.33746130031 0.338922669872 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.235294117647 0.251872472559 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.142414860681 0.174417080927 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0835913312693 0.112833075102 74% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48214975225 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501547987616 0.524397521467 96% => OK
Word variations: 51.2092376833 59.2087087015 86% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.15 20.5533526081 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1958804408 48.84282405 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.65 120.699889404 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.15 20.5533526081 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.55 0.644075263715 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 39.6794117647 45.7405998639 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.31313131313 1.45489161554 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470828441505 0.300154397459 157% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0837688696528 0.103427244359 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.077569731895 0.0752933317313 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.491907472004 0.497263757937 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.165234401952 0.151897553556 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184317407469 0.114077575197 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938146812805 0.0781384742642 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.446114122856 0.336927656856 132% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0953277341516 0.067059652881 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.359945200416 0.210909579961 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744570137285 0.0618886996521 120% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.