A friend has written to you asking for advice about a problem at work. you have had a similar problem in the past.write a reply to your friend . In your letter:1. tell your friend you understand the problem.2. explain what happened to you in the past.3.

Essay topics:

A friend has written to you asking for advice about a problem at work. you have had a similar problem in the past.

write a reply to your friend . In your letter:

1. tell your friend you understand the problem.
2. explain what happened to you in the past.
3. suggest possible solutions to the problem

Dear Nikhil,

I hope this letter finds you well. I understand you are very much occupied with the new project work as it’s a green field implementation.
As you had mentioned in your last letter regarding an issue you are facing in Call Forwarding case to voice mail. I believe you are facing the issue only in the case of call forwarding to not reachable case.
In fact , I had encounter similar issue during the airtel project implementation at Mumbai.
In order to troubleshoot I had captured end to end wireshark traces of the failure cases. Upon detailed debugging issue identified at HLR end.
In your case , I suggest you to check first subscriber provisioning at SCP end. This will help you to eliminate scripting error of database. Once you passed on this check I think then definitely u can corelate my case with yours one and get the rectification implemented at HLR end.
To me you must be able to identify and solve your issue from above mention steps.
Do let me know if suggestion works for you or not ?
Best Regards,

Ajay

Votes
Average: 8.5 (4 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-08-13 KKapasi 73 view
2018-08-12 Dan123 73 view
2020-08-13 KKapasi 73 view
2017-10-06 drhema 79 view
2018-09-04 alijawad 78 view
Essays by user ajaykpat :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...it's a green field implementation. As you had mentioned in your last letter r...
^^^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rwarding to not reachable case. In fact , I had encounter similar issue during t...
^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...achable case. In fact , I had encounter similar issue during the airtel project ...
^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ue identified at HLR end. In your case , I suggest you to check first subscriber...
^^
Line 12, column 5, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for you or not ? Best Regards, Ajay
^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'i think', 'in fact']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25 0.220444632235 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.205882352941 0.167888034529 123% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0539215686275 0.0606518309736 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0343137254902 0.0506257000042 68% => OK
Pronouns: 0.117647058824 0.118615021944 99% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122549019608 0.107062808482 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0588235294118 0.041066498444 143% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77348908413 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0392156862745 0.0385302599488 102% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00132118243153 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0539215686275 0.0714148451538 76% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0147058823529 0.0191574576366 77% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00930345855455 0% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1058.0 1141.60824742 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 206.134020619 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6577540107 5.53046319177 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.78085437643 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.256684491979 0.284621296913 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.20320855615 0.211203875043 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.155080213904 0.133321485273 116% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.122994652406 0.0843313296314 146% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77348908413 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 127.690721649 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.622163163488 102% => OK
Word variations: 63.1223481349 62.8969750728 100% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 12.9587628866 100% => OK
Sentence length: 14.3846153846 16.4300151701 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4419128698 44.7399317507 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3846153846 90.9928171075 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3846153846 16.4300151701 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.615384615385 0.613754768223 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.29896907216 163% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 2.09278350515 239% => OK
Readability: 34.7054709996 37.5504026743 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.20547945205 1.13073093955 107% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400291278541 0.331212695627 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.112619554799 0.0927372745006 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.103190578738 0.0736520305886 140% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.741400713867 0.579516596996 128% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.199450263272 0.180689518051 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145774429323 0.122183219658 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850004687097 0.0765303033291 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.155845344062 0.211926503985 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.044019764864 0.0737400523855 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188780292872 0.203819188451 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678026839602 0.067151250289 101% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.45360824742 54% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.48453608247 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.0206185567 199% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 4.73195876289 63% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 1.03092783505 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.56701030928 234% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 8.32989690722 108% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

I had encounter similar issue
I had encountered a/the similar issue
I had encountered similar issues

from above mention steps.
from above mentioned steps.

Sentence: I believe you are facing the issue only in the case of call forwarding to not reachable case.
Description: The token to is not usually followed by a negator
Suggestion: Refer to to and not

Sentence: Once you passed on this check I think then definitely u can corelate my case with yours one and get the rectification implemented at HLR end.
Error: corelate Suggestion: correlate

flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 184 250
No. of Characters: 828 1500
No. of Different Words: 120 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.683 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.5 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.701 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 45 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 35 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 12.267 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.094 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.335 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.518 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.233 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5