In general, people think that political views could be shown to students in the classroom by their teachers. They support that from their teachers’ opinions, students learn about political views what teachers have and consider about what students’ political views. However, the notion does not reflect the stance that I hold and does not thought about in a different light. I believe that teachers’ political views should not be announced to their students in the classroom because students will be bias at their point of political views and unnecessary discussion would be occurred between teachers and parents.
First of all, by teachers’ announcement, students would have narrow focus of political views. To be specific, students who do not have any political views tend to be colored by their teachers’ political views, even if their views would be good or not. As modern society is becoming increasingly, political views should be changeable with current social environment and growth of students. However, if teachers have taught their students their own political views, their students would not be changed in the past. For example, today’s people live in the globalized world with fast-paced developing social environments and also a great deal of political views is developing with contemporary political environments. It requires people to be global minded and think deeply with their own thinking. Thus, this proves that teachers’ political views could not be published to students in the classroom in order to prevent students from having narrow focus of political views.
Moreover, it is unnecessary to publish teachers’ political views to students in the classroom, which as a result makes troubles between teachers and parents. In addition, students might pass their teachers’ political opinions to their children and it would be problematic for them. Although their opinions are with good meanings for their students, parents would not think like that. For instance, in our society, political views are taboo between people whatever they are closed or not. This is because people have different political opinions and these opinions would grow up as a political clash between them. As a result, in order to prevent political clash, they should not make their political views to students in the classroom.
To sum up, I believe that it is not necessary for teachers to teach their students their political views in order to make their students not be bias on their political views and prevent political clash between parents and teachers. Consequently, the importance of my views cannot be underestimated in that it can kill two birds with one stone for the reasons I have mentioned above.
- TPO-06 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 60
- TPO-13 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-27 - Integrated Writing Task The little ice age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900CE. There were unusually harsh winters, and glaciers grew larger in many areas. Scient 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'think'
Suggestion: think
...ect the stance that I hold and does not thought about in a different light. I believe t...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in general', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235059760956 0.229887763892 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.149402390438 0.158761421928 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0996015936255 0.0866891130778 115% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0458167330677 0.046263068375 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0697211155378 0.0685040099705 102% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133466135458 0.118717715034 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0358565737052 0.0351676179071 102% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.93343851377 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0298804780876 0.0309702414327 96% => OK
Particles: 0.00398406374502 0.00188951952338 211% => OK
Determiners: 0.0438247011952 0.0887237588012 49% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0318725099602 0.0209618222197 152% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00796812749004 0.0139019557991 57% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2749.0 2387.08602151 115% => OK
No of words: 432.0 408.028673835 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.36342592593 5.86048508987 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.391203703704 0.338922669872 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.314814814815 0.251872472559 125% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.259259259259 0.174417080927 149% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.166666666667 0.112833075102 148% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93343851377 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.400462962963 0.524397521467 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 43.2040765821 59.2087087015 73% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.7368421053 20.5533526081 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3767551641 48.84282405 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.684210526 120.699889404 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7368421053 20.5533526081 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.789473684211 0.644075263715 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 54.2183235867 45.7405998639 119% => OK
Elegance: 1.52631578947 1.45489161554 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421600784285 0.300154397459 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.170594430723 0.103427244359 165% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.105771844884 0.0752933317313 140% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.554898050782 0.497263757937 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133316621317 0.151897553556 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199562663939 0.114077575197 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11210117224 0.0781384742642 143% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.597481254444 0.336927656856 177% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.039289067477 0.067059652881 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342501386737 0.210909579961 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020905351218 0.0618886996521 34% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8870967742 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.75985663082 254% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.