Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.
The author in the issue talks about that young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term goals rather than to pursue seek immediate fame and recognition. After all, Young people are future of the country. At the very outset, I would like to state that I am in the complete agreement with what author says. There are multiple reasons for any agreement with author’s view. I would like to enable my point of views in the succeeding paragraphs.
Primarily, I see no discord with what author suggest, he says that young people are future of the country and community, so they should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals for future. Moreover, he also says that people should also take care that young people will not pursue seek immediate fame and recognition and I am totally agreed with author. Moreover, there are various reasons which prompt my approval. In the light of the topic, it is quite impressive to encourage the young youth to pursue long-term future goals for better future for community and better future for country. Furthermore, Young people are very capricious and whimsical about their future. So it is parents and teachers responsibility to take care about child’s future goals and if the goals is not realistic & long-term then it is their responsibility to give them better guidance for it. Hence, there seems no loopholes in what author says.
Eventually, one aspect which may elude one’s perspective. As the topic says young youth should encouraged to pursue long terms and realistic goals rather than to pursue seek immediate fame and recognition. Young youth should also take care about their future goals that if it is good for country or not. Their parent’s and parents should also take care that to fulfil their future goals the young youth not take wrong steps and they should live in present. For example, young people goal is to become rich in future, so to achieve this goal he/she would take a path for robbery may be it is possible. So their guide should take care about their goals that if the goals are long-term and realistic or not. After all, if the young youth achieve goal for immediate fame may be it is possible they should go on wrong path and then nevertheless, the rough end should be smoothed. However it is easier to said than done. The wearer knows where the shoe pinches, so we have to put ourselves exactly in the same situation before delivering a judgment.
Finally few more explanation will justify my stand. Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term and realistic goals but they also take care about they live in present and their goals should not be to achieve immediate fame.
In conclusion, to wrap up my discussion over this issue. I once again exemplify as I have done in the previous paragraphs. After all, life has many options we take some and abandon some. In crux, I agree with author’s point of view.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-18 | amandali2921 | 83 | view |
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 54
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 54
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished quot 75
- Scandals-whether in politics, academia, or other area-can be useful. They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could." 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...on and I am totally agreed with author. Moreover, there are various reasons which prompt...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...le, young people goal is to become rich in future, so to achieve this goal he/she would t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...al he/she would take a path for robbery may be it is possible. So their guide should t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 778, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...g youth achieve goal for immediate fame may be it is possible they should go on wrong ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 886, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...less, the rough end should be smoothed. However it is easier to said than done. The wea...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...uation before delivering a judgment. Finally few more explanation will justify my st...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'then', 'after all', 'for example', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.227112676056 0.240241500013 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.147887323944 0.157235817809 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100352112676 0.0880659088768 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0528169014085 0.0497285424764 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.068661971831 0.0444667217837 154% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.112676056338 0.12292977631 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0140845070423 0.0406280797675 35% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.55603454912 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0334507042254 0.030933414821 108% => OK
Particles: 0.00176056338028 0.0016655270985 106% => OK
Determiners: 0.0580985915493 0.0997080785238 58% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0352112676056 0.0249443105267 141% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0105633802817 0.0148568991511 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2930.0 2732.02544248 107% => OK
No of words: 501.0 452.878318584 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84830339321 6.0361032391 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.311377245509 0.366273622748 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.193612774451 0.280924506359 69% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.14371257485 0.200843997647 72% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.119760479042 0.132149295362 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55603454912 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 219.290929204 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.397205588822 0.48968727796 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.893122728 55.4138127331 81% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6194690265 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5555555556 23.380412469 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5070248093 59.4972553346 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.518518519 141.124799967 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 23.380412469 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 0.674092028746 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 37.9168330007 51.4728631049 74% => OK
Elegance: 1.3137254902 1.64882698954 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452991161063 0.391690518653 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0818697411643 0.123202303941 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.100865763455 0.077325440228 130% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.447045675219 0.547984918172 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.170191589492 0.149214159877 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148309388405 0.161403998019 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189002014244 0.0892212321368 212% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.419823737535 0.385218514788 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.191870874692 0.0692045440612 277% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31678193802 0.275328986314 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148501303555 0.0653680567796 227% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.4325221239 163% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 7.22455752212 180% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.