Zoos have failed to serve their purpose in the matter of wild life. Animals can live better in freedom than confined places like zoos. Do you agreee or disagree with the idea?
usefullness of zoos can be doubted on grounds if they have really failed to meet thier basic purpose they are meant for and secondly if there could be a better substitute for saving wild life. The main issue reamains the concern to save wild life. On certain grounds it can be proved no other place than zoos could be a safe option for animals.
To put the matter into proper perspecive, changed conditions from the past clearly show without human intervention animals won't be able to survive and it would be problem. Firstly, forests are no more in a position to support animals by supplying the needed amount and type of food. It has become clear by studying the incidents of animals intruding into human dwellings for survival and food. Human activities have led to dwindling space and habitat of animals and clashes in them during competition have often led animals to a losing position. Are we waiting to see a world cleared of wild life?
To elucidate the matter further, animals roam in forests without food especially carnivorous. They get infected and die in abnormal conditions as nature itself fails to nurture anymore. How could unhealthy natural conditons support healthy conditions for wild life when environment has been harmed beyond limits?
Agreed that mismanagement could be a discontent with working of zoos.But that calls for ammendment on the part of zoo authorities for needed action. It however cannot rule out the idea of singnificance zoos hold.
A zoo provides health care and food as prescribed by best animal care experts. Besides there is no incidence of poaching like a tiger for instance faces in forest. Kids can safely watch even the most ferocious creatures and learn to appreciate beauty in nature. Also a zoo prevents people from free play with animals otherwise vulnerable to abuse in wild.Thousands of cases of atrocity to creatures pass unnoticed in the wild. Who cares? What else the zoos could do?
How important is a zoo can easily be gauged by the fact that had there been zoo a little longer in the past, our kids could have seen the Australian tiger, the mamoth, the saber tooth and many other species saved but today they survive in pictures and fossils.Dodo has become History. Not to talk of big zoos, even a small could prove useful to save valuable life.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2011-08-19 | harjinder singh | 61 | view |
- Family life is so important. These days families are dividing into smaller ones. Joint family has been successful in many ways. Now it is believed nuclear family has more opportunities for success than joint families. 94
- Zoos have failed to serve their purpose in the matter of wild life Animals can live better in freedom than confined places like zoos Do you agreee or disagree with the idea 61
- Increasing ground traffic is creating serious problems and challenges in life. Some suggest that shifting most of the traffic to air would be the best solution.Do you agree or disagree with it? 80
- Humans having evolved in mental abilities than the past more than physical ones, have actually created imbalance in them and in some ways life has become harder and challenging than the past. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 77
- Billions of dollars are spent on beauty business by people all over the world. This has led to develop an indifferent and passive attitude to real health needs. Do you agree or disagree with it? 93
Comments
reply to comment
Thanks for appreciating and encouraging me.
Harjinder Singh
Sentence: usefullness of zoos can be doubted on grounds if they have really failed to meet thier basic purpose they are meant for and secondly if there could be a better substitute for saving wild life.
Error: usefullness Suggestion: usefulness
Sentence: The main issue reamains the concern to save wild life.
Error: reamains Suggestion: remains
Sentence: To put the matter into proper perspecive, changed conditions from the past clearly show without human intervention animals won't be able to survive and it would be problem.
Error: perspecive Suggestion: perspective
Sentence: How could unhealthy natural conditons support healthy conditions for wild life when environment has been harmed beyond limits?
Error: conditons Suggestion: conditions
Sentence: Agreed that mismanagement could be a discontent with working of zoos.But that calls for ammendment on the part of zoo authorities for needed action.
Error: ammendment Suggestion: amendment
Sentence: It however cannot rule out the idea of singnificance zoos hold.
Error: singnificance Suggestion: significance
flaws:
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
great essay! it is now in top list!
http://www.testbig.com/essay-categories/ielts
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 399 350
No. of Characters: 1878 1500
No. of Different Words: 231 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.469 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.707 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.448 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 131 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 94 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.792 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.264 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.526 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.048 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5