Trying new things
Firstly, in today’s competitive world, the most important factor that helps people to stand out among other people in a group is experience. Experiences can be acquired by practicing new ways rather than sticking to old methods. By obtaining new experiences, one can enhance his chance of being superior among a group. An engineer’s life can serve as a prominent example here, by attending engineering schools a person can get hold of an engineering certificate which merely can guarantee a secure and prosperous occupation in the future, but what makes the real difference is the adeptness of an engineer in a subject, which stems in his own experiences, that can assure a good job for a person. This vividly demonstrates the crucial role of carrying out new methods in our life.
Secondly, our daily life is hectic and boring, which makes tolerance of our lives hard and bothersome for most of us. Practicing novel methods can create a way out of this tedious and monotonous life. My life is a good example of it, I wake up in morning, eat my breakfast, go to work, come back home, eat my dinner and sleep as many other individuals. This routine depicts a lackluster life which nobody wishes for. But by dedicating time to different things and doing new things like going to cinema, learning how to play a musical instrument, and travelling to new locations, I make my life more fun and exciting.
Last but not least, our today’s advanced life is the direct result of our ancestors’ new methods. If they didn’t implement new methods, we today, surely would be deprived of our high-tech gadgets and instruments. Take the life of Tomas Edison as an example, although he was rich and didn’t need any money, he performed a sort of new experiments that after consuming a great deal of his time and wealth resulted in invention of light-bulbs. Without his assiduous attempts in executing new things, it would be impossible for us to have the privilege of lighting our cities and homes at nights.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-06 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 76 | view |
| 2022-01-13 | Madalinaa1 | 76 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | Ankita@050 | 60 | view |
| 2021-04-11 | SaC | 79 | view |
| 2019-02-13 | sneh0879 | 77 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75568181818 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70623991991 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.3798380649 48.9658058833 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.571428571 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154799672902 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615640485308 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753994830112 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103823165315 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220208811399 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.