The table compares the number of people who travel overseas in the year of 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005. The areas are grouped into Africa, America, Asia and pecific, Europe and Middle East.
The total number increased rapidly from 448.9 million in 1990 to 615.2 million in 1995, followed by moderate growth in the next decade and reached 693.7 million in the year of 2005. African oversea tourists showed a steady increase from 18.2 million in 1990 to 28.7 million in 2005. On the contrast, American international travelers boomed from 80.5 million in 1990 to 112.5 million in 1995, followed by a slightly increase to 118.2 million in 2000 and dipped to 113.2 million in the year of 2005.
The number of international visitor from Asia and the pecific raised steady from 60.2 million in 1990 to 135.8 million in 2005. Europian visitors increased drastly from 280.2 million in 1990 to 390.3 million in 1995, showed a slowly increase in the next ten years and reached 400.2 million in the year of 2005. Middle East international travelers burgeoned slowly from 9.8 million in 1990 to 15.8 million in 2005.
By comparison, Europian visitors comprised the biggest section of the total international travelers. Africa, Asia and the pacific and Middle East generated steady growth in the number of visitor from 1990 to 2005 whereas America manifest a up and down in the two decades.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 55
- The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures can be taken to solve them? 73
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million 80
- The table below shows the cinema viewing figures for films by country, in millions. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nd pecific, Europe and Middle East. The total number increased rapidly from 448...
^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...0 to 112.5 million in 1995, followed by a slightly increase to 118.2 million in 2000 and dipped to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slowly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...n 1990 to 390.3 million in 1995, showed a slowly increase in the next ten years and reached 400.2...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...m 1990 to 2005 whereas America manifest a up and down in the two decades.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93991416309 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43992076882 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.420600858369 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6298063255 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.1 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363285545082 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187380446528 0.103423049105 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128699692093 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239068611727 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930524087502 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.