Should government spend more money on improving roads than highway, or should government spend more money on improving public transportation.
Development in transportation system is vitally for all government. Some people believe that governments must allocate more budget to develop and extend its roads and freeways, but others belief that public transportation is more important than roads. In my point of view, second is more important. This essay will gives some reasons which will discuss during following paragraphs.
First of all, the most significant merit of public transportation development is reducing air pollution rate. These days air pollution and global warming is the issue of all scientists and governments. In cities, especially mega city, people need to use vehicle to go for working, shopping, cinema and etc. So they must use their vehicle or public transportation. The greenhouse gas which emissions by personal cars increase air pollution, however by using public transportation this problem will be solve.
Furthermore, by developing public transportation system, people will use its financial advantages. To use personal car persons must spend a lot of money for its fuel, insurance, fixing and other costs. While, if people use public transportation, they will allocate a little proportion of their budget for transport. For instance, in Tehran (capital of Iran), as price of gas is higher than word’s average price, people need to spend a quarter of their income for transportation. Although, this will be diminish to five percent by using metro or BRT.
Last but not less, almost all cities suffer from traffic and crowd that is consequence of cars. Wasting time, lower efficiency and headache are the problems that brought about via traffic. Public transportation prevent from these problem, because it moves people in large scale. According to the recent article which published by world economy and healthy (WEH), people average spend two hours in traffic each days, whereas this can decrease to half by using public transportation.
In conclusion, personally I think improve public transportation system is more important than roads. Three major reasons were discussed to support this idea which were includes of air pollution, financial aspect and traffic.
- Some people prefer to work for large company. Others prefer to work for small company. Which would you prefer? 70
- fake 2 3
- some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. other people prefer to prepare and eat at home. which do you prefer? 80
- What are the important qualities of a good son or daughter? Have these qualities changed or remained the same over time in your culture? 76
- how to wire ta paper ( fake and nonsense) 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
...cond is more important. This essay will gives some reasons which will discuss during ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...cle to go for working, shopping, cinema and etc. So they must use their vehicle or publi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...fic. Public transportation prevent from these problem, because it moves people in large scale...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, whereas, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43880597015 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97801553394 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576119402985 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9426180424 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172899788987 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050165193308 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632183772809 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968793562958 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413010288467 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.