the bar chart shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006.
Given is the bar chart comparing the turnover in dollars from the sale of various types of digital games during the period from 2000 to 2006.
It is evident from the information supplied that sale for handheld games was by far the most popular during the period in question. In addition, the sales of games for three out of four platforms rose each year.
To specify, from just under 12 billion dollars in 2000, the sale of handheld games then increased slightly to about 14 billion dollars for the following five years. This was followed by a significant growth, with the sale reaching a peak of 16 billion dollars in 2006. By contrast, console games which were the second popular game listed in 2000, at 6 billion dollars, dropped to its lowest point of approximately to 3 in 2006. Gaining popularity from 2001 with a mere of 1 billion dollars, online games saw a soar to a staggering of roughly 8 billion dollars in the sale, which came second in 2006. It is interesting to note that the sale of mobile phone games launching in 2002, then, went up steadily to about 7 billion dollars in 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-17 | livevanzz | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Deelip shrestha | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | Dwi Wahyudi | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-04 | Lorand | 73 | view |
| 2017-10-12 | ShirleyR | 69 | view |
- the line graph shows changes in the consumption of meat from 1955 to 2012. 84
- as countries develop, their population tend to live individually small family. In your opinion what is cause and what are effect on society. Is it a positive or negative development? 93
- the table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011. 84
- Noise pollution has been a serious issue in many countries nowadays. Some people think that it should be strictly controlled, others think that they could make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- percentage of mobile phones owners using various mobile phone features 51
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58375634518 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44605800693 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53807106599 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3459963198 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411298236023 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192226786037 0.103423049105 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897401702182 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27594818117 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121951163382 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.