Productivity and rewards
The reading and the lecture are both about productivity and rewards which is a approach to getting employees to work hard and to improvr productivity by rewards with money or company stock. According to the author it is considered a important management principle in many buisness enterprises whereas the lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the reading. He thinks that it is kind of punishment because of the several reasons.
First of all, the author claims that rewards calculates the amount of increased productivity at work place. He belives that by giving rewards to the employees, the performane of the workers get improve and good results are seen. This point is challenged by the lecturer by considering this system as a punishment. He elobrates it by saying that all employees need respect rather than incentives or any reward. Furthermore, he thinks that productivity rewards are counterproductive that is due to this rewarding less productivity is done.
Secondly, the author of the reading thinks that typical buisness handbooks describing compensation methods advocate giving the greatest rewards to those who perform the best. The lecturer refutes this point. He belives that if the emplyee does not get the expected reward, he/ she may show disagreement and moreover reduce the quality of work.
Finally, the author of the reading also mentions that the people are rather like physical bodies that requie some external motivation force to be set in motion. Also, he mentions that if the reward are correctly structured, results will be remarkable. This point is challenged by the lecturer and he refutes it by saying that the employ of the work place may get disappoint when not reciving any reward and he thinks that the relation of the supervisor and the employ can be damaged.
Eventually, there may be a decrease in quality work and also in productivity.
In conclusion, the lecturer effectively casts doubt on all the claims and theories presented in the reading.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | TatianaGHGH | 86 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | mnm | 63 | view |
| 2021-06-26 | monigdc | 78 | view |
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings. 66
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 54
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.Write a response in which you disc 54
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. 58
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...about productivity and rewards which is a approach to getting employees to work h...
^
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ccording to the author it is considered a important management principle in many ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1472392638 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89554304421 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490797546012 0.540411800872 91% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5881475254 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350684062133 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124716140804 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170412711531 0.0662205650399 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163955771519 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164189294539 0.0443174109184 370% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.