In this set of material both the reading and the lecture discuss a fascinating topic so as to online encyclopedia's downside and upsides. The reading states that it has many flaws and provides three reasons of support. Nevertheless, the professor explain that it is much better than traditional encyclopedias and opposes each of the author's reason.
First the reading passage cited that the information that is presented online has many faults due to contributors often lack of academic credential. In contrary, the professor provides information that even though, there is possibility for incorrect data, it is much more simple and effortless to correct liken to traditional encyclopedias. She also states that the incorrect information may stay decades on traditional ones. Distinctly, a disparity exists between the article and the evidence exhibited by the professor. As a result, we can assume that one of momentous merit of online encyclopedia is to be fixed so easily.
Second, the reading passage pushes fort the idea that it is so vulnerable to hacker attack which will bring about the data being fabricated or deleted. Nonetheless, the professor contends that issue is overcome by hiring special editor who monitors the all movement, comments and editing. She stated that, in case of any malicious attack that may be impeded. Consequently, we can argue that indeed the claim made in the reading is unsubstantiated and does not reflect the facts.
Finally, the reading passage posits that online encyclopedia focus and go too deep on the subject by giving through explanation at every details which leads to confusion for reader to understand which information important or not. The professor refutes this point by explaining that since the there is limited space for traditional encyclopedia, amount of data to be contained is chosen. Unlike traditional encyclopedia, online encyclopedia is well advantageous pertaining to this problem, therefore it contains as much as data with regard to in many respects.
In summary, while both the reading and the professor provide interesting information with regard to online and traditional encyclopedias, a significant amount of evidence support that the professor presented much more legitimate and tangible grounds. Thus, the reading passage fails to justify the claim towards the lecture.
- Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decline.One hypothesis 85
- If you were an employer, which kind of worker would you prefer to hire : an experienced worker at a higher salary or inexperienced worker at a lower salary? 100
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing TaskSome people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing thi 80
- permanent human being on the venus 81
- Some people like to do only what they like already do well. Other people prefer to try new things and take risk. Which one do you prefer? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...the lecture discuss a fascinating topic so as to online encyclopedias downside and upsid...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'encyclopedias'' or 'encyclopedia's'?
Suggestion: encyclopedias'; encyclopedia's
...uss a fascinating topic so as to online encyclopedias downside and upsides. The reading state...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'overcome'.
Suggestion: overcome
...s, the professor contends that issue is overcame by hiring special editor who monitors t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 547, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun respect seems to be countable; consider using: 'many respects'.
Suggestion: many respects
...tains as much as data with regard to in many respect. In summary, while both the reading ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, in summary, as a result, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1373.03311258 145% => OK
No of words: 366.0 270.72406181 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43169398907 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05008604368 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532786885246 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 419.366225166 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0203161923 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.941176471 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5294117647 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.70588235294 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206007398761 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669914711802 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615437049693 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118276341884 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649698995117 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 63.6247240618 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.