The graph on the right shows the way people of Somecountry invested their money during the year 2001-2006.
The bar chart compares the amount of money engaged by people in Somecountry in bonds and stocks investment starting from 2001 until 2006.
It can be clearly seen that in 2001, there were only 100 billions invested in bonds and 210 billions in stocks. People were still devoting their savings in both stocks and bonds with 216 billions and 123 billions respectively over the next year. There even had a more engagement of billions in 2003 in these two investments with only 70 billions difference.
In addition to that, 2004 had a remarkable increase in the money spent on both investments where 162 billions were put in bonds and 289 billions were used up in stocks. In the next year, bonds and stocks investments had a constant rise with only smaller amount of billions in difference. Furthermore, the only year when these two investments reached its peak was in 2006, when ventures in bonds arose in 188 billions and money alloted on stocks was 311 billions.
To sum up, the report demonstrates that people in Somecountry were more favorable in committing their money savings to stock investments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-10 | KAREN FABRO | 67 | view |
- The graph on the right shows annual water usage (in millions of cubic meters) by industry in Somecountry. 73
- The graph on the right shows annual water usage (in millions of cubic meters) by industry in Somecountry. 73
- The graph on the right gives information on wages of Somecountry over a ten-year period. 73
- The graph on the right shows how prices of high-tech gadgets changed over time in Somecountry. 33
- The graph on the right shows the way people of Somecountry invested their money during the year 2001-2006. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir money savings to stock investments.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, still, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93048128342 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66654631926 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.5079846943 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.25 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210954635719 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113647603452 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687495735244 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166405079858 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061848645549 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.