Tpo22
In this set of material, both of the reading and lecture discussion about using ethanol fuel Instead of gasoline. The reading provides three reasons that ethanol has destructive effects on environmental, however the professor finds all reasons suspicious and unconvincing. In fact the information the lecture provides contradicts the fact outlined in the reading passage.
First, the author of reading declares that both of gasoline and ethanol enter a lot of CO2 to atmosphere. Needless to say that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and it increases global warming, however the lecture argues although it is true that ethanol releases CO2, but there is a bit of different point here. Since this fuel is obtained by corn plant; consequently this plant will absorb CO2 from atmosphere and no more carbon dioxide will be enter from air.
Second, the text claims that making ethanol from plants can reduce the animals' food; however the professor refutes this suggestion, because for gaining ethanol is usually used cellulose of corn instead of whole of this plant and it is better to said that the animals do not eat cellulose in corn’s stem.
Moreover, the reading contends the price of ethanol and gasoline is equal as long as the United State government supports this fuel in front of tax. If the government stops helping to producing of ethanol, its price will be increased, however the lecture expresses that it is obvious that if people require much ethanol; subsequently with more demands, the companies or factories will dwindle the price of ethanol and it will be available so that its price will be reduced till 45 percentages.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
both of the reading and lecture discussion about using ethanol fuel Instead of gasoline.
both of the reading and lecture discuss about using ethanol fuel Instead of gasoline.
although it is true that ethanol releases CO2, but there is a...
Description: don't put 'although' 'but' in one sentence.
because for gaining ethanol is usually used cellulose of corn instead of whole of this plant
because for gaining ethanol, cellulose of corn is usually used instead of whole of this plant
and it is better to said that the animals do not eat cellulose in corn's stem.
and it is better to say that the animals do not eat cellulose in corn's stem.
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 12
No. of Words: 271 250
No. of Characters: 1339 1200
No. of Different Words: 145 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.057 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.941 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.587 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 87 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 43 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.111 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.255 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.889 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.423 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.533 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.099 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...king ethanol from plants can reduce the animals food; however the professor refutes thi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08118081181 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69170423983 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542435424354 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.8344930337 49.2860985944 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 110.228320801 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1111111111 21.698381199 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427899368974 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16478951827 0.0996497079465 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881337034988 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238454513891 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729769923439 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.3589403974 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 53.8541721854 76% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.