Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity?
Cycling is undoubtedly a cheap and atmosphere friendly mean of mobility. However, owing to rapid advancement in the field of transportation industry its popularity is declining. Nevertheless, awareness among masses regarding the benefits of cycling is a robust way to augment its fame.
To begin with, unlike cycles smoke emitted by cars and buses is hazardous to surroundings as well as health. Furthermore, in metropolitan regions, where traffic congestion is the most burning issue of the current era, people feel convenient on cycles than using public or self-owned transport.
Having said that, use of cycles has not been widely accepted in many developed countries around the globe. The reason being that, these localities are considered to be business hubs, as a result of a hectic routine, time is considered more significant, therefore, folks prefer to use swift sources of traveling. Moreover, in many cities vast majority of a population is above fifty and cycling at this age is a herculean task.
Still, advantages of cycling as an environment-friendly vehicle cannot be overlooked. Governments, as well as civil society can play a vital role in encouraging people to use cycles instead of atmosphere hostile vehicles. Firstly, people must be taught through print, social and electronic media regarding positive aspects of cycling. We can convince people that, using cycle can lessen the prevalence of global warming, intense climates and soaring pollution. Additionally, peddling strengthens the muscles and blood flow in the body which can give them a healthier life.
To recapitulate, although there are various benefits of using cycle, still it is not widely accepted in current era due to modern medium of traveling and busy life where time is considered more precious than any other thing. The most effective way cycling can get recognition is to educate public and develop infrastructure to accommodate two wheels on road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-04 | RSudhir | 63 | view |
| 2020-05-11 | maximumz160@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-30 | gagandeep@13 | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child's development while others think that it is important for children to go to school.Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion 93
- Some people say that television is useful for education, while other say it is useful only for entertainment.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 95
- Nowadays most large companies operate multi nationally To what extent those companies should have a responsibility towards local communities in which they operate 89
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do disadvantages of this development for society outweigh advantages 80
- Some people think that the government should pay one of the parents of very young children to stay at home to look after their children.What do you think would be the advantages and disadvantages of this policy?Give reasons for your answer and include any 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is a robust way to augment its fame. To begin with, unlike cycles smoke emitt...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, well, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41503267974 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07866900267 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640522875817 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5025568155 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.466666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18640054726 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589510757852 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440995501143 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10160764074 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536420141502 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.