Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
“It is more important to use land for human needs such as farming, housing, and industry than to save it for endangered animals.”
As human population is significantly growing, people's requirements are rapidly increasing due to the needs for more food, machines, and place to live. As a result, people require more land areas to provide their needs. However, we sometimes forget that we are not alone on this planet. Hence, I strongly disagree with this assertion that human needs are more important than saving land for endangered animals.
To begin with, the existence of many endangered species is an essential factor for the health of the environment. Take tiger, for instance, being the topmost animal in food-chain, healthy number of tigers show all other parts in an ecosystem are working fine. Thus, the impact of these animals on saving the ecosystem is well evident. Likewise, using forests for our needs is no less than attacking the homes of the wild animals, many of which are endangered species. This deforestation has also detrimental impacts on our already fragile ecosystem. The major impact of fewer trees is high pollution because there are significantly fewer trees to absorb the Carbone Dioxide and breathe out Oxygen. This has some consequences like global warming and irregular weather patterns, which is gradually making the planet inhabitable. The result could be deadly and probably irreversible if deforestation is not controlled, and could be very costly for humanity.
Secondly, many native species have been already vanished from the face of the earth due to the loss of proper habitats. If this deforestation is not stopped we will not have anything but only captured memories of these animals on earth to show to our future generations. Therefore, people should be more aware about the consequences of the extinction of these specious’ natural environment. By doing so, we are not only able to see these beautiful creatures but also show them to our children.
In addition, the humans should be more considerate and kind towards the Mother Nature and the living beings on earth. Consider the example of Persian cheetah, at present, cheetahs can be seen only in the animated movies or rarely in the protected lands. If the right steps had been taken at the appropriate time, we could save more cheetahs. By being considerate to animals, we are making sure that the food chain and the habitat of these animals do not get disturbed. To this end, the cycle of nature will not be manipulated by humankind.
In conclusion, we should protect endangered species’ habitat for some reasons such as maintenance of the ecosystem’s health, showing them to our posterity, and being more considerate to these animals. This is why I posited the supportive statement to save land for endangered animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-28 | ebrahim.vhb87 | 80 | view |
- TPO 46- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 76
- TPO28 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than parents were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO20- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 40- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“It is more important to use land for human needs such as farming, housing, and industry than to save it for endangered animals.” 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2268.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86531782279 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537414965986 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7466374436 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6086956522 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1739130435 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.39130434783 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264910730083 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785036592209 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105665088786 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168156301189 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113566357282 0.0645574589148 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.