The diagram below shows changes in modes of transport chosen by travellers in a Europen country from 1950 to 1990
The bar charts shows the transport chosen by people from 1950 to 1990.
The graph shows 21% people chose commute by in 1950, where 32% people opted bikes. Almost, 7% selected travel by car and about 40% selected travel by foot.
In 1970, public transport was high compared to other way. Where, maximum number of people's travelled by bus it was 32%, followed by 27% who used cars and were in turn followed by 23% who chose bikes. Proportion of people and at that only 17% preferred to walk.
However, in 1990 most of people preferred travel by car it was 63%, next the mode chosen by approximately 16% was the bus, bikes and walking were around 10% of travellers.
Finally, the graph indicate car indeed became the prime choice over the period 1959 to 1990 in European country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-19 | zyan jabbar | view |
- School children are becoming far too dependent on computers. This is having an alarming effect on reading and writing skills. Teachers need to avoid using computers in the classroom at all costs and go back to teaching basic study skills. 67
- Today our communications medicine and transport system all depend on computer technology Our reliance on computer technology has created a dangerous situation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and inc 73
- Some people say that self employment is better than a job in a company or an institution. 56
- The table below shows information about the Eiffel Tower and Peteonas Towers 66
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time . This can beneficial for teenagers and the community as well. Do you agree or disagree. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
The bar charts shows the transport chosen by people from 195...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to commute'
Suggestion: to commute
...1990. The graph shows 21% people chose commute by in 1950, where 32% people opted bike...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 18, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...7% preferred to walk. However, in 1990 most of people preferred travel by car it was 63%, nex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 642.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 139.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61870503597 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43363162301 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22515089752 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625899280576 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 180.0 283.868780488 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0030046919 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.25 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211032881191 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101008976736 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115445716327 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145170395704 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128154604648 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.