Tpo43
In this set of material, both of the reading and lecture discuss about a group marine animals that have gone extinct. This group is related with Agnostid fossils which have found in many areas. The reading provides three theories that how Agnostid lived or what they ate; however the professor finds all surmises the weakness. The information the professor provides contradicts the fact outlined in the reading passage.
First, the author of reading contends that Agnostids could swim very fast and also they were strong pardators which were feeding small organisms in the ancient ocean; however the professor refutes this suggestion. He believes that other types of arthropods (in fact Agnostid were a kind of primitive arthropods) had big eyes that this characteristic helped them to become a strong predators, but Agnostid fossils show that they lacked of big eyes, even they more seems that had been blind. Other organs that could have helped them in this way did not find.
Secondly, the reading claims that Agnostids lived in Seafloors, however the lecture rejects that these organisms were seafloor dwellers. Since the animals which live on seafloor move very slowly; hence they just find in small areas. Inasmuch Agnostid fossils have found many areas, this conclusion could be drawn that Agnostids were be able to move fast and enter to other geographic areas.
Third, the reading declares that Agnostids might have been parasites and they could have lived and fed on their host (maybe primitive fishes or other organisms); however the population of parasites has to be small, otherwise they can destroy the population of host; so the a great number of Agnostid fossils which have found in the world, ignores this idea.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-06 | Aliakbari94 | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-03-02 | taisuke571 | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-31 | nj-me | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | 想不到一个好名字 | 80 | view |
- A university has money in its budget to do one thing to improve its facilities for students It can either improve the quality of the technology for example computers and printers that it provides for students Or it can redesign spaces where students hold 93
- do you agree or disagree? students should consider studying in fields related to subjects like technology, math, science and so, if even they are more interested in other subjects. 90
- do you agree or disagree? people gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life or not. 76
- tpo32 73
- do you agree or disagree? the environment issues are too complex to be handled by individuals. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'animal'?
Suggestion: animal
...nd lecture discuss about a group marine animals that have gone extinct. This group is r...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 380, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'predator'?
Suggestion: predator
...teristic helped them to become a strong predators, but Agnostid fossils show that they la...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 329, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...onclusion could be drawn that Agnostids were be able to move fast and enter to other...
^^^^
Line 6, column 334, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...sion could be drawn that Agnostids were be able to move fast and enter to other ge...
^^
Line 8, column 268, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
... can destroy the population of host; so the a great number of Agnostid fossils which ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, may, second, secondly, so, third, well, as to, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 283.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14134275618 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37028472914 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508833922261 0.540411800872 94% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.0827969683 49.2860985944 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.272727273 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.493372146133 0.272083759551 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194699891174 0.0996497079465 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941415583924 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318356960112 0.162205337803 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454683681421 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.