Pterosaur
In the lecture the professor made several points about powered flight capability of Pterosaur. However, the reading passage declares that they would not able to fly by flapping their wings. However, the professors’ lecture refutes the hypothesis of the reading on account of the following reasons.
First, the professor states that the fossil of Pterosaur demonstrates dense hair covering which is similar to the fur and is commonplace in warm-blooded animal and adjust the metabolism of Pterosaur like the metabolism of warm-blooded animal which could supply enough energy for flapping the wings. On the contrary, the reading passage highlights that, these cold-blood animal not able to speed their metabolism produced the required sufficient energy.
Second, the professor mentions that anatomy of Pterosaur is light enough to keep airborn and flapping the wings. In addition, the bones have hollow shape instead of being slid and as a result their weights are not enormous to prevent flapping wings. In contrast, the reading explains that they are so heavy to flap their wings swiftly.
Third, the professor declares that there are huge differences between the birds and Pterosaur. In fact, birds use only their legs and their two limbs for walking. However, Pterosaur uses all of their limbs for walking not just their backboe. On the other hand, the reading stresses that are not able to take off from the ground since their back leg muscles are too small and weak.
All in all, the professor's lecture contradicts the information of the reading passage.
Recent study of Pterosaur fossil demonstrating as warm-blooded animal, light anatomy and using the four limbs despite birds ability to use merely their legs demonstrates that capacity of powered flight or gliding is in doubt.
- agnostids behavior 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 88
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 90
- bees nest 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, in addition, in contrast, in fact, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28671328671 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66344532965 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513986013986 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.460456841 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219938592758 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901191373657 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107239069954 0.0662205650399 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113685432464 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558021958362 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.