When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Preservation of historic buildings is necessary but conditional. If the premises has some historic significance, or an archaic architecture, or any unique character that can be found no where else, only than it should be preserved. In short, if by any means, the historic premises holds importance that stands greater than the needs of residents only then it should be protected. Otherwise, it is good to replace old buildings with new infrastructure. There are several benefits of getting rid of these aged buildings.
To being with, the old infrastructure and design might pose a threat on neighboring residents by being susceptible to falling. If the building is old enough, and there is no surety of it being able to survive harsh nature then it should be safely dismantled. Bad weather or light earthquake waves, which now a days has become a frequent phenomenon, pose a great threat to such weak premises.
Moreover, in densely populated urban areas there is always a shortage of space near city centers, therefore, the space uselessly occupied by these old buildings can be wisely implemented for public service infrastructures. Hospital, School, Old age home, Orphanage or a Church can always replace any old infrastructure that does nothing but stands there laughing on the fate of homeless. Take for an example, an archaic temple was dismantled brick by brick and reconstructed at a more spacious location near Delhi, in India to provide space for modern construction.
Additionally, removing an old construction can give space for various commercial infrastructures like a supermarket or recreation park or a movie theater, this will help society in several ways. In addition to aiding accessibility to neighborhood, it will generate jobs and it may become a point of attraction for residents increasing the prices/revenues of properties in proximity.
However, it is not suggested that every building be replaced with a new infrastructure. Heritage sites, attract tourism and reminds us of our culture. Furthermore, they are a symbol of greatness of our fore-bearers. Heritage sites, if maintained well, too can prove themselves of extensive use. For instance, Various old buildings in England are now serving as museums. In Delhi, old premises have been resurrected to serve as government offices.
Conclusively, as mentioned earlier, that it depends on circumstances, if the need of people has more gravity than preservation of an old useless construction, then it should be replaced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | vikey | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | chagens96 | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | tanishqjain1002 | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Charan H S | 50 | view |
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 42
- Educators should base their assessment of students' learning not on students' grasp of facts but on the ability to explain the ideas, trends, and concepts that those facts illustrate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or d 66
- It has become easier and more affordable for people to travel to other countries. Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? Give your opinion and relevant examples from your experience. 67
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the President of the Amburg Chamber of Commerce."Last October, the city of Belleville installed high-intensity lighting in its central business district, and vandalism there declined almost immediately. The 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... any unique character that can be found no where else, only than it should be pres...
^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: BEING_BEGIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'begin'?
Suggestion: begin
...ting rid of these aged buildings. To being with, the old infrastructure and design...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
...eather or light earthquake waves, which now a days has become a frequent phenomenon, pose ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...er or light earthquake waves, which now a days has become a frequent phenomenon, pose ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2118.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34848484848 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29172454258 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2686330412 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.9 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228289778355 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640739683374 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413669638126 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108894835156 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449325212739 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.