Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage.
The article states about the presence of the human on venus is quite impossible. However, the lecture completely opposes the point made in the reading. The professor says that it certainly possible.
First, the article posits that venus have high atmospheric pressure than earth and due to this stations and human will crashed if they will land on venus. This point is contradicted by the professor. he says that this problem will be solved if the station float above the 50 kilometers above the ground like the balloon. He further explains this point by the physical fact, higher the atmosphere leads to decrease in the pressure. Eventually, no station will crash.
Second, the reading claims that human can not survive on venus because there is no water and oxygen and we could not supply enough water and oxygen from the earth to the venus. However, the lecturer states that venus have other gasses like carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide and by the chemical process we can produce enough oxygen and water which will necessary for human survival.
Finally, the reading states that on venus we could not produce electricity because clouds are blocking sunlight and it could not reach the ground. The professor contradicts that point by saying that it is true, could reflect sunlight, however, the cloud thickness is not considerable. Furthermore, he explains that the solar power cells can collect sunlight from the above and below of clouds and by that way we can produce electricity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-08 | LKL | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | rosedudu | 3 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | mattayousak | 3 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | mattayousak | 3 | view |
| 2020-11-01 | iscaxap | 76 | view |
- Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage. 3
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 66
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement. Students are influenced by the teacher or friends. 60
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a 70-millio 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific point made in the reading passage 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ospheric pressure than earth and due to this stations and human will crashed if they...
^^^^
Line 2, column 120, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'crash'
Suggestion: crash
...and due to this stations and human will crashed if they will land on venus. This point ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 200, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...point is contradicted by the professor. he says that this problem will be solved i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00806451613 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44778988849 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2815545556 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5384615385 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.084559866351 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371594828299 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412947672798 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0553825999542 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218798367384 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.