Some believe that it is good for a country’s culture to import films and TV programmes, while others think it is better for a country to have their own films and tv programmes.
Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
Whether import or local films and TV programs are more important for a country is caused a controversial debate. From my observation, I strongly believe that both of them are equally necessary for any nation all over the world.
On the one hand, there is sufficient evidence to infer that international films and TV shows play an integral part in several cultures. Firstly, utilising domestic films can not only equip individuals a more well-rounded perspective of life but also provide countless critical knowledge about traditional values and national identity of several regions in the world. For example, through a Japanese film, foreign people can accumulate various comprehension about Japanese culture such as local meals of specific characteristics of people in this country. Secondly, it is undeniable that watching external TV shows can greatly benefit for young students who learn an international language. By applying this practical and interesting method, learners would be able to advance their language’s ability.
On the other hand, it cannot be denied that domestic films and TV programs have an essential role and meaning for each individual and the community of the nation. Firstly, there is the likelihood that internal films can facilitate people through insights into what happen in their country, which developing the public’s patriotism. For instance, there are a myriad of films about local history, which give adolescents a golden opportunity to take pride in their origin and treasure the life they have today. Furthermore, only by producing the own TV programmes can the country gain a great deal of money. The art field can make a high contribution to the wealth of national authorities in certain countries, such as Korea.
In conclusion, I am in support of the opinion that the significance of domestic and international films and TV programmes cannot be brought into comparison to see which one is more necessary because they have distinctively equal meanings to every country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-22 | cnade95 | 78 | view |
| 2017-01-24 | Binh_nguyen | 66 | view |
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries Why young people choose to do so Who will benefit more young people or the communities 81
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places and how to increase its popularity ? 78
- In recent years, the structure of a family and the role of its member are gradually changing.What kind of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 78
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 84
- Some believe that it is good for a country’s culture to import films and TV programmes, while others think it is better for a country to have their own films and tv programmes.Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...s patriotism. For instance, there are a myriad of films about local history, which giv...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35109717868 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05236125458 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579937304075 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6660045036 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.307692308 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288757577291 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101151741463 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649026338582 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179922489599 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645624148934 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.