Smoking is a major cause of serious illness and death throughout the world today. In the interest of the public heath, governments should ban cigarettes and other tobacco products.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is not a secret that albeit medicine field has been revolutionizing exponentially for many years and resulting in subsequent adequate medical conditions for the general population, one cannot be certain that virtually all of health threats have completely faded away. Alterations in the ways of lives and behaviors have potential to be direct reason since smoking habits have proliferated and been causing worldwide concern. Many people suggest that government should restraint smoking and I personally agree to some extend of that idea.
When discussing positive and negative effects of smoking and drugs, we should accentuate positive impacts hardly ever tangible as smoking is not a source of any bane. Most considerably, smoking is provoking absolutely hazardous diseases especially lung and liver cancer. Therefore, it is crucial that government impose restraints on ever increasing smoking habits. This might be observed in the examples of establishments of non-smoking public areas.
It is substantially overt that without government support and funding on smoking restrictions, achieving considerable results may impossible. Controlling large sectors of mass media is undeniable absolute power, comparing to any other alternatives, in reshaping people’s attitudes towards more healthy lifestyles. Taking into consideration these opportunities, antismoking television shows and programs benefit people and can certainly be paid off all the time.
However, it should not be ignored that although there are vast amounts of efforts made by governments, particular self-protecting emotions in awareness of smoking-related disorders is simultaneously necessary among people.
As above-mentioned facts reveal, fighting against smoking is not necessarily countries’ responsibility. Coexistence of efforts of both by governments and people are required to achieve success in such issues because it is not unilateral but bilateral.
- Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions of what individuals really want to do in their spare time To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- The only way to reduce amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work, education or shopping.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 97
- Young people in modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous young generation Why is this the case What impact does this have on the relationship between old and young people 30
- Music is played in every society and culture Some people think that music brings only brings benefits for individuals and society Others however think that music can have negative influences on both Discuss both views and give your opinion 93
- In the past sporting champions used to be motivated primarily by desire to win a match or to break world records These days they are more likely to be motivated by prize money and opportunity to be famous What massage does this send to young people and ho 53
Sentence: It is substantially overt that without government support and funding on smoking restrictions, achieving considerable results may impossible.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by an adjective
Suggestion: Refer to may and impossible
flaws:
No. of Words: 277 350
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 277 350
No. of Characters: 1627 1500
No. of Different Words: 191 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.08 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.874 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.281 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 138 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 63 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.308 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.984 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.308 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.342 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.628 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.076 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5