Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Thanks to technology, these days, preparing food has become extra convenient. However, a growing number of people argue if this type of convenience owing to products such as microwave ovens, cookers and the rest has resulted to considerable enhancement in the livelihood of people? There can be no doubt that such luxuries have created positive impacts in the daily lives of humans.
To begin with, the above mentioned efficient equipments are commonly used by the majority of people for cooking, defrosting and reheating foods and beverages on regular basis. Needless to say that this type of modern electronic products have made our lives very convenient. To illustrate, these ovens work really quickly and save an individual's energy when compared to conventional cooking methods. What's more, using it requires less supervision and you can even set times and walk away, complete your assignments and other stuffs while your food is being prepared. Not only it is velocious and productive but also it becomes healthy for us. Using them can prevent the loss of vitamins and minerals in your food which are often regarded as essential nutrients for the development of cells and tissues of the body, while following traditional cooking styles, such vital elements are lost in liquid during the process of heating. As a result, some people are prone to life threatening disease like cancer according to the research.
Besides enjoying a real benefit from cooking, there are numerous advanced fruit and vegetable choppers for preparing food which have changed our complicated life to an easy one. To demonstrate, generally speaking, many people are often found to cut their hands while mincing vegetables and also amputating their digits completely. In addition, they tend to end up with tearing eyes particularly when handling fruits like onions. So with the use of the small machines, you can cut your foods quicker with really tempting size and shape that often resembles to the dimensions made by professional chefs. Over and above that, you donot have to worry about the potential danger and bad smell of some fruits. Since they are effective and efficient, you can utilise your extra time spending with your children and dealing with other household activities.
In conclusion, we can say beyond any dilemma that these valuable machines have hugely transformed our liveliness significantly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-03 | mabick_1527 | 30 | view |
- Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society?Give reasons for your answer. 11
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 76
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The bar chart shows the monthly spending in dollars of a family in the USA on three items in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Wri 79
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of working from home. 73
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment should parents and 90
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Not only it is velocious and productive but also it becomes healthy for us.
Not only is it velocious and productive but also it becomes healthy for us. //inversion when 'Not only' is at the beginning
Sentence: Not only it is velocious and productive but also it becomes healthy for us.
Error: velocious Suggestion: No alternate word
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 384 350
No. of Characters: 1971 1500
No. of Different Words: 237 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.427 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.133 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.626 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 136 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 81 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.588 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.541 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.765 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.286 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.466 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.101 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Dear sir, I would like to ask
Dear sir, I would like to ask for your short valuable advise on how can I improve on nominalisation? I look forward to your suggestions. Thank you sir.
'nominalization' means nouns
'nominalization' means nouns with a suffix like: 'tion' 'ment' 'ence' 'ance'. words like: organization, development, entrance....
If you can use nominalization as nouns, it is great, if not, it is not a big deal. 'nominalization' has minor effects on the overall score.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...e ovens work really quickly and save an individuals energy when compared to conventional co...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...mpared to conventional cooking methods. Whats more, using it requires less supervisio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, really, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25520833333 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70259307547 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2460905642 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.705882353 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5882352941 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166511944137 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490303719222 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342064440773 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902096593903 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058503444521 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.