TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec
The reading states that cane toad species was intentionally introduced to Australia with the expectation that it would rescue the crop of the farmers by eating harmful insects. Moreover, sadly, the result was not the one they expected because they multiplied swiftly, and this vast population threatens small native animals. The passage provides three strategies to avoid the distribution of the cane toad in Australia. However, the professor comments that none of these approaches are useful for solving this matter and refutes each of the solutions.
First, the passage claims that building a national fence would be one possible solution to avoid the distribution of the toad. Moreover, this method has been implemented in another place before, and there is no need for being worried about its consequences. The lecturer, meanwhile, makes the argument that it is improbable to limit young toads from moving because they use rivers and streams to flow from one place to another.
Second, although the reading passage asserts that the toads could be easily captured and diminished by some volunteers, the professor disagrees and believes that this can be harmful if the collectors would be some inexperienced people. She adds that because they can damage some other species like frogs which live near the river or the streams close to the toad eggs.
Third, in contrast to the lecture which posits that some researchers are making a disease-causing virus to manage and control toad populations, the lecturer says that this idea is trouble-making. She strongly comments that this virus can make some difficulties in the original habitat of some endangered animals because they are an important part of the whole ecosystem. Thus, If they eliminate toads from the place, some other species related to these the availability of these animals may suffer from this disappearance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | SereneT110G760 | 68 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | jewel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | Ashfaq | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | S M Naimul Mamun | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | S M Naimul Mamun | 80 | view |
- TPO 18- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Essay topics: TPO 18- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 80
- TPO14-Task2Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO15-task1 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, third, thus, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78011990149 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563333333333 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7887319325 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387621495657 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144853908588 0.0996497079465 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07689832044 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235251748129 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481611413222 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.