A glance at worker's attitudes toward their tasks at work brings to light a question that has several times provoked discussions, that is, whether having various types of tasks to do makes them more satisfied than doing similar tasks. Some might contend that focusing on a single task boosts workers' efficiencies, thus making them more satisfied by accomplishing more. However, I would like to suggest that workers would be happier if they are given more tasks in terms of facing challenges and learning new skills.
First and foremost, handling different tasks requires different skills, thus providing workers with opportunities to learn new things. For example, workers might find that they need to utilize a new set of softwares in the office or new machines and tools in factories to finish a new task, the process of which brings about novel knowledge and make them more capable and experienced as a worker. By picking up new skills, the workers would absolutely feel more content than simply repeating the same things every day.
Secondly, having different sorts of tasks to do diversifies people's work. It is widely accepted that working on a single task for a long time, like several years, make people tired of them, thus lowering their evaluations for the work they are doing. Offered with various tasks, on the contrary, workers would face new challenges and deal with new problems. If they solve those problems successfully, they can harvest a sense of achievement and content.
Last but not least, as the workers are capable of handling different tasks, it is highly likely that they will get recognition from the employees. A worker would be appreciated if he or she can improve the efficiency of the company and lower the cost for the company to operate by being eligible for doing many different types of tasks, for the company can now hire fewer employers. As a result, current employers might get a pay rise or promotion, leading to a higher level of satisfaction in their work.
Due to the aforementioned ground, I firmly believe that doing various tasks during the workday makes people more satisfied than doing similar tasks, and the chances to face challenges and learn new skills are two prime and conspicuous reasons.
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 83
- TPO-24 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples 70
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 73
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 81
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... to operate by being eligible for doing many different types of tasks, for the company can now...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in fact, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01066666667 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61769160394 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530666666667 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.4035922854 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.214285714 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7857142857 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30963652131 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117929847159 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717248025842 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190252455528 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688405941825 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.