Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations Other think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed Discuss these views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations. Other think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss these views and give your own opinion

Many people believe that third word countries need financial support from the international community whereas others take the opposite view and claims that developing nations need education, infra structure development, health care and community based development programs. While practical aid and policy programs have their own merits I would argue that financial aid plays an integral role in supporting poor countries.

On the one hand, community based programs and strategic advice are extremely important for developing countries. One reason is that, practical aid programs such as vaccination to prevent major diseases, developing medical and education centers and supporting structures are needed to resolve existing social problems. For example, thousands of vulnerable children in Africa have been saved by International aid programs from agencies such as the International Cross Organization and Doctors Without Border.s Organization provide aid which has proven successful in rescuing the general population from these countries from disease and starvation. Another reason is that most national leaders have their own limited vision or knowledge of strategic development. Expert Consultants from international groups could help them optimize and manage development policies for all programs. This would be a positive impact on all aspects of their country's programs. The result would lead the nation to future prosperity for their citizens.

On the other hand, I would argue that financial support from the international community plays a significant role for poor nations. Firstly, if the governments had enough money in their budgets, they could promote small businesses for people with low interest loan. The result being, many people could make ends meet and stop the poverty cycle. Secondly, traffic infrastructure in poor countries could be improved by investing aid money to build concrete roads, highways and bridges which could connect the remote areas to cities. Therefore, trading and traveling could help increase rural development and the economy. Furthermore, aid money could be used to improve the educational system so that universal education could be implemented. When children are educated and can use their knowledge, it helps develop much needed career prospects for the future.

In conclusion, although specifiic aid and consultants are beneficial in some ways for developing countries, I believe that financial support is more beneficial for third word countries

Votes
Average: 8.1 (12 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-01-14 jjj 84 view
2019-12-22 D87eepak 73 view
Essays by user vu thi tuoi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ountries need financial support from the international community whereas others t...
^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...loping medical and education centers and supporting structures are needed to reso...
^^
Line 3, column 738, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their own limited vision or knowledge of strategic development. Expert Consultant...
^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng, many people could make ends meet and stop the poverty cycle. Secondly, traffi...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, whereas, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77837837838 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87538100502 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57027027027 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.123996453 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.764705882 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7647058824 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.82352941176 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251367921989 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777224531107 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05529419288 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165767841887 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572283097196 0.056905535591 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.