The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.
The given first graph illustrates the change in number of marriages and divorces in millions in the USA over a period of four decades. The second chart compares the Americans adults status in two year 1970 and 2002.
According to the first bar graph, there was no change marriage part between 1070 and 1980, 2.5 million marriages registered in America. whereas the number gradually decreased and reached to 2 millions by the year 2002.
In the divorced case, the number of divorces were around 1 millions during 1970. After 10 decade, numbers rapidly increased 1.5 million. Finally number again reached to back position 1 million in 2000 year.
From the second graph, we can observe that in 1970, the 70 % America adults got married, which was highest percentage rate in marriage status. While, during the year 2002 , the marriage percentage slightly down the 60 % of adult Americans were married in 2002. there had been less divorces figure in 1970 and reached at peak almost 15 million after 3 decades.
We found that 70 % adult were married but 15% adults got never married in 1970. While, the percentages 5 % increased in 2000.
To conclude, The windowed percentage were 1ess down 10 % in both 1970, 2000.
- the diagram below shows the tiny town of headly village eventually merging with fonton city from the period 1925 to 1975 till now 89
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 64
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided Into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...illion marriages registered in America. whereas the number gradually decreased and reac...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... numbers rapidly increased 1.5 million. Finally number again reached to back position 1...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 96, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
... 70 % America adults got married, which was highest percentage rate in marriage status. Whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...iage status. While, during the year 2002 , the marriage percentage slightly down t...
^^
Line 6, column 262, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...f adult Americans were married in 2002. there had been less divorces figure in 1970 a...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 277, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun divorces is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ns were married in 2002. there had been less divorces figure in 1970 and reached at ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t 15% adults got never married in 1970. While, the percentages 5 % increased in 2000....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95588235294 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43251314106 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9907283503 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7692307692 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6923076923 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254037677077 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948024336455 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722845165099 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137935705929 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747105115759 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.