The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The charts illustrate the levels of participation in education and science in both developing and industrialized countries in the year 1980 and 1990.
The first graph shows a comparison of the number of years alloted for education over a ten year period. In developing countries, there was a slight increase from 2.2 years in 1980 to 2.7 years in 1990. In 1980, the average years of schooling in industrialized countries was at 8.2 years, respectively which grew to 10.2 years in 1990, which is summed up by a marginal growth of 2% over the ten year comparison.
The number of scientists and technicians per 1000 population in developing countries in the year 1980 is at 10% which grew to 17% during the ten year duration. Meanwhile, in industrialized countries, the graph shows a massive increase, increase of about 29%, which was at 41% in 1980 and at 70% in 1990.
As for expenditures for research and development in developing countries, it decreased from 50 billion dollar in 1980 to 25 billion dollar in 1990. On the contrary, spendings of industrialized countries grew to 350 billion in 1990 compared to 160 billion in 1980.
In overall, it is concluded that, when compared to developing countries, industrialized have more years spent on education which produces more scientists and technicians. This also relates to the high level of expenditure alloted for research and development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-24 | sweet16@yahoo.com | 78 | view |
- Millions of people every year move to English-speaking countries such as Australia, Britain or America, in order to study at school, college or university.Why do so many people want to study in English? Why is English such an important international langu 78
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?Use your own ideas knowledge and exp 56
- The charts below show the result of a survey of adult education The first chart shows the reason why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared 75
- The diagram below shows how Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 84
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, while, as for, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08225108225 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15745598658 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463203463203 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3933609594 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.4 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249819193194 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129142771218 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995892367145 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187434315247 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118406671055 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.