The bar chart below shows the information about the population size in an area of UK and its birth rate and death rate in 1700, 1800, 1900 ad 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant.
The bar chart illustrates the number of population and the rate of birth and death in an area of UK in four different years: 1700, 1800, 1900 and 2000.
As can be seen from the chart, there was an upward trend in population size and the birth rate was always higher than the death rate throughout the examined years.
It is also clear that standing at lowest point with 1,5 in 1700, the number of people experienced a steady increase in the area of UK by 1 each 100 year from 1700 to 2000, with 4,5 at the end of the period.
Another noticeable point from the chart is that the rate of birth and death concurrently reached the highest in 1800 at 0,65 and 0,45 respectively. The birth rate in 1700 and 1900 were approximately the same at 0,45, whereas the death rate in 1700 was slightly lower than that in 1900. Additionally, while the death rate was the lowest at roughly 0,3 among four years, the birth rate was still high with about 0,6 in 2000.
- Some people believe that schools should only teach children subjects which are beneficial for their future career and therefore others subjects such as music and sports are not important.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 40
- Some people think the government should pay for health care and education but other people claim that it is the individual s responsibility Discuss both views and give your opinion 79
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities can cause serious problems in both places. What are the serious problems and what measures can be taken the solve these problems? 61
- More and more people work from home and study from home with the development of computer technology. DO you think it is positive or negative development? 84
- The bar chart below gives information about water use in China USA Russia and Australia in 2010 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3595505618 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30580852094 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522471910112 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 23.85139176 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339863318815 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203277359885 0.103423049105 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980065021074 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235976550216 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113767198954 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.88 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.6 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.