The lecture and reading both discuss Eastern Europe of the zebra mussels spread in North America. The author believes that constant widespread of zebra mussel in North America was unstoppable. It gets the negative influence on fish population. The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made in the article. He thinks that all points of the author are dubious and now possible to control spreading of zebra mussel in North America.
First of all, the author implies that human migration may responsible for invasion of mussel in North America. He states that mussel adhere to ship bottom and easily survive by ballast water. This point is challenged by lecturer. He says that in past, it was true that cannot control the invasion of mussel because of lack of knowledge. However, in present number of ways found to prevent spreading of mussel. For instance, ship travel from Europe to North America, that time ballast water fill in ship but ship could empty after to reach in North America and refill by salt water, in salty water mussel cannot survive.
Secondly, the author emphasizes that zebra mussel dominant in new habitat because of no predators and high rate of reproduction. The lecturer rebuts this argument. He mentions that in beginning of new habitat area has no predator but after native birds seek new food. New food replaced old food and birds eat huge amount of mussel, therefore, mussels were no longer dominant in new habitat.
Finally, the author states that zebra mussel eat plenty of planktons resulting decrease the overall population of fishes. The lecturer, in contrast, points out that mussel habitat not negative effect on fish population. He elaborated on this point by says that mussel has positive effect on bottom sea fish because planktons eat by mussel's and they provides lots of nutrients in water which sediment in bottom and feed by larger bottom fishes. Even though decrease the planktons, increase the larger bottom fishes.
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 65
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 73
- TPO-27 - Integrated Writing Task The little ice age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900CE. There were unusually harsh winters, and glaciers grew larger in many areas. Scient 75
- The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone Agree or disagree 70
- Talking face to face is better way of conversing than writing email and text massage. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...is challenged by lecturer. He says that in past, it was true that cannot control the in...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 349, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...cause planktons eat by mussels and they provides lots of nutrients in water which sedime...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns, increase the larger bottom fishes.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, may, second, secondly, therefore, for instance, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 30.3222958057 181% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 325.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41595485674 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498461538462 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.1549898462 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2105263158 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1052631579 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.504369106338 0.272083759551 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155187878863 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986263598194 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302172075475 0.162205337803 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648881874 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.