The figure illustrates the process followed by Australian Bureau of Meteorology to produce weather forecasts.
It is clear that the production of weather forecasts consists of four main stages. Overall, the information is collected from many sources at the beginning, after being analysed and prepared, it is broadcasted on various kinds of multimedia.
At the first and second stage of making weather broadcasts, the most recent information is received by three ways and then is analysed also in three ways. Firstly, incoming information can be received by satellite and then presented for analysis as satellite photo. The same data can be passed to radar and presented on radar screens or synoptic charts for analysis. Secondly, incoming information can be directly received by radar and analysed on radar screens or synoptic charts. Finally, drifting buoy can also collect information which can be shown on synoptic charts for analysis.
The process continues with preparing for the broadcast using computers. At the final step, trustworthy weather forecasts now can be brought to public on TV newsreader program, on radio and on recorded telephone announcement.
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 73
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them? 84
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up- to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. 78
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 61
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade - labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50276243094 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93412301497 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6253384259 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141142460471 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654942531192 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868858526133 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122538529283 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114282454997 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.