It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do your agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
Many people would agree that prompt development of conscience in the kids is consequential. There is a difference of opinion, however, whether using the punishing-approach is appropriate for that or not. I firmly believe that any physical or verbal abuse for the sake of discipline them is unacceptable and should be avoided.
My strong belief of refraining from using the penalising approach is primarily based around the idea that this technique has nothing but dire psychological consequences on the personality of the child. The parents use hitting or swearing publicly to their offspring to teach them and remind them their limits. Nevertheless, according to the prominent Psychologists as well as socio-behavioural studies, the kids suffer from the spanking and smacking are more likely to possess more challenging behaviour, depression and anxiety.
There are various ways to encourage the kids in developing conscience including empathy, support, advise and praise. All these ways cannot only be beneficial in building the character of a child also make him a self-disciplined and responsible part of the society. Other than these ways, to me time-outs and withholding the pocket money are only doable forms of disciplinary penalties. As far as teachers concern, the quite or naughty corner could play a significant role to keep the order of a classroom.
In conclusion, I am in the opposition of using any form of physical or verbal assault to teach them discipline as it can damage their mental health. Light penalties of financial or enjoyment deprivation can cast a positive impact to clarify the behavioural limits for the kids.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | essamadel | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | essamadel | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | lokeshwari | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | Ankita7443 | 67 | view |
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion. 77
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics Pros Cons 88
- Fatherhood ought to be emphasised as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have a baby leads on to the idea that they are also responsible for upbringing. To what extend you agree and disagree with t 61
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 77
- do you think our life is better than our forefathers 96
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fy the behavioural limits for the kids.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24986435053 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628352490421 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4427823977 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0879471014109 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314557132639 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04095531952 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0538664433792 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510134981093 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.